Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28921418›Full record

ReviewMolecular neurobiology2018

Coping with Phantom Limb Pain.

Damien P Kuffler

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular neurobiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04285138 (Effects of Phantom Exercises on Pain, Mobility and Quality of Life Among Lower Limb Amputees), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04285138 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Phantom Exercises on Pain, Mobility and Quality of Life Among Lower Limb Amputees

TypeinterventionalSponsorRiphah International UniversityRan2020 to 2020Enrolled24ConditionsLower Limb AmputationArmsphantom limb exercise, conventional treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Electroacupuncture For Alleviation Of Phantom Limb Pain.Journal of rehabilitation medicine. Clinical communications · 2021
    Article
  12. Mechanisms for Reducing Neuropathic Pain.Molecular neurobiology · 2020
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damien P KufflerInstitute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico, Medical Science Campus, 201 Blvd. del Valle, San Juan, PR, 00901, Puerto Rico. dkuffler@hotmail.com.
University of Puerto Rico, Medical Sciences Campus · PR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phantom limb pain is a chronic neuropathic pain that develops in 45-85% of patients who undergo major amputations of the upper and lower extremities and appears predominantly during two time frames following an amputation: the first month and later about 1 year. Although in most patients the frequency and intensity of pain diminish over time, severe pain persists in about 5-10%. It has been proposed that factors in both the peripheral and central nervous systems play major roles in triggering the development and maintenance of pain associated with extremity amputations. Chronic pain is physically and mentally debilitating, affecting an individual's capacity for self-care, but also diminishing an individual's daily capacity for personal and economic independence. In addition, the pain may lead to depression and feelings of hopelessness. A National Center for Biotechnology Information study found that in the USA alone, the annual cost of dealing with neuropathic pain is more than $600 billion, with an estimated 20 million people in the USA suffering from this condition. Although the pain can be reduced by antiepileptic drugs and analgesics, they are frequently ineffective or their side effects preclude their use. The optimal approach for eliminating neuropathic pain and improving individuals' quality of life is the development of novel techniques that permanently prevent the development and maintenance of neuropathic pain, or that eliminate the pain once it has developed. What is still required is understanding when and where an effective novel technique must be applied, such as onto the nerve stump of the transected peripheral axons, dorsal root ganglion neurons, spinal cord, or cortex to induce the desired influences. This review, the second of two in this journal volume, examines the techniques that may be capable of reducing or eliminating chronic neuropathic pain once it has developed. Such an understanding will improve amputees' quality of life by blocking the mechanisms that trigger and/or maintain PLP and chronic neuropathic pain.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalAmputation, SurgicalAnalgesicsAnimalsElectric Stimulation TherapyHumansNeuralgiaPhantom LimbTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAnalgesicsBrain stimulationCranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES)Deep brain stimulation (DBS)Motor cortex stimulation (MCS)Neuropathic painSpinal cord injuryTranscranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)

Identifiers

PMID28921418
OpenAlexW2755932954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.