Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28921398›Full record

ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2018

Preliminary analysis of numerical chromosome abnormalities in reciprocal and Robertsonian translocation preimplantation genetic diagnosis cases with 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray.

Yanxin Xie, Yanwen Xu, Jing Wang, Benyu Miao, Yanhong Zeng, Chenhui Ding, Jun Gao, Canquan Zhou

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Reproductive outcomes in individuals with chromosomal reciprocal translocations.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yanxin XieGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yanwen XuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jing WangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Benyu MiaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yanhong ZengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chenhui DingGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Jun GaoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Canquan ZhouGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Reproductive Medicine, Guangzhou, China. zhoucanquan@hotmail.com.
The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University · CNSun Yat-sen University · CN

Funding

the Guangzhou City Science and Technology Board Foundation: the establishment of genetic disease preimplantation embryos and early pregnancy screening model 201300000097The Nature and Science Foundation of Guangdong Province S2012010009176
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to determine whether an interchromosomal effect (ICE) occurred in embryos obtained from reciprocal translocation (rcp) and Robertsonian translocation (RT) carriers who were following a preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) with whole chromosome screening with an aCGH and SNP microarray. We also analyzed the chromosomal numerical abnormalities in embryos with aneuploidy in parental chromosomes that were not involved with a translocation and balanced in involved parental translocation chromosomes.

methodsThis retrospective study included 832 embryos obtained from rcp carriers and 382 embryos from RT carriers that were biopsied in 139 PGD cycles. The control group involved embryos obtained from age-matched patient karyotypes who were undergoing preimplantation genetic screening (PGS) with non-translocation, and 579 embryos were analyzed in the control group. A single blastomere at the cleavage stage or trophectoderm from a blastocyst was biopsied, and 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray was conducted using the PGD/PGS protocols. Statistical analyses were implemented on the incidences of cumulative aneuploidy rates between the translocation carriers and the control group.

resultsReliable results were obtained from 138 couples, among whom only one patient was a balanced rcp or RT translocation carrier, undergoing PGD testing in our center from January 2012 to June 2014. For day 3 embryos, the aneuploidy rates were 50.7% for rcp carriers and 49.1% for RT carriers, compared with the control group, with 44.8% at a maternal age < 36 years. When the maternal age was ≥ 36 years, the aneuploidy rates were increased to 61.1% for rcp carriers, 56.7% for RT carriers, and 60.3% for the control group. There were no significant differences. In day 5 embryos, the aneuploidy rates were 24.5% for rcp carriers and 34.9% for RT carriers, compared with the control group with 53.6% at a maternal age < 36 years. When the maternal age was ≥ 36 years, the aneuploidy rates were 10.7% for rcp carriers, 26.3% for RT carriers, and 57.1% for the control group. The cumulative aneuploidy rates of chromosome translocation carriers were significantly lower than the control group. No ICE was observed in cleavage and blastocyst stage embryos obtained from these carriers. Additionally, the risk of chromosomal numerical abnormalities was observed in each of the 23 pairs of autosomes or sex chromosomes from day 3 and day 5 embryos.

conclusionThere was not enough evidence to prove that ICE was present in embryos derived from both rcp and RT translocation carriers, regardless of the maternal age. However, chromosomal numerical abnormalities were noticed in 23 pairs of autosomes and sex chromosomes in parental structurally normal chromosomes. Thus, 24-chromosomal analysis with an aCGH/SNP microarray PGD protocol is required to decrease the risks of failure to diagnose aneuploidy in structurally normal chromosomes.

Indexed as

Chromosome AberrationsDNA Copy Number VariationsTranslocation, GeneticAdultCase-Control StudiesComparative Genomic HybridizationFemaleFertilization in VitroHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicroarray AnalysisPilot ProjectsPolymorphism, Single NucleotidePregnancyPregnancy RatePreimplantation DiagnosisArray CGHInterchromosomal effectPreimplantation genetic diagnosisReciprocal translocationRobertsonian translocationSNP

Identifiers

PMID28921398
PMCPMC5758468
OpenAlexW2756096021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.