ArticlePediatric radiology2018
Can diffusion-weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant pediatric liver tumors?
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Self Supervised Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models for Abdominal DW-MRI.Computational diffusion MRI. CDMRI (Workshop) · 2023Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging of fetal abdominal pathology: a complementary tool to prenatal ultrasound.Pediatric radiology · 2023Article
- 3D variable flip angle T1 mapping for differentiating benign and malignant liver lesions at 3T: comparison with diffusion weighted imaging.BMC medical imaging · 2022Article
- Liver magnetic resonance imaging: how we do it.Pediatric radiology · 2022Review
- Paediatric gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary radiology: why do we need subspecialists, and what is new?Pediatric radiology · 2021Review
- Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI in the initial assessment of osseous sarcomas in children and adolescents.Pediatric radiology · 2019Article
- Determination of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Characterization of Hepatic Focal Lesions with Adaptive Multi-Exponential Intravoxel Incoherent Motion Model.Translational oncology · 2018Article
- [Imaging of abdominal tumors in childhood and adolescence : Part I: Background, hepatic, splenic and pancreatic tumors].Der Radiologe · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere are limited data on utility of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in the evaluation of pediatric liver lesions.
objectiveTo determine whether qualitative and quantitative DWI can be used to differentiate benign and malignant pediatric liver lesions. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe retrospectively reviewed MRIs in children with focal liver lesions to qualitatively evaluate lesions noting diffusion restriction, T2 shine-through, increased diffusion, hypointensity on DWI and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and intermediate signal on both, and to measure ADC values. Pathology confirmation or a combination of clinical, laboratory and imaging features, and follow-up was used to determine final diagnosis.
resultsWe included 112 focal hepatic lesions in 89 children (median age 11.5 years, 51 female), of which 92 lesions were benign and 20 malignant. Interobserver agreement was almost perfect for both qualitative (kappa 0.8735) and quantitative (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC] 0.96) diffusion assessment. All malignant lesions showed diffusion restriction. Most benign lesions other than abscesses were not restricted. There was significant association of qualitative restriction with malignancy and non-restriction with benignancy (Fisher exact test P<0.0001). Mean normalized ADC values of malignant lesions (1.23x10
conclusionQualitative diffusion restriction in pediatric liver lesions is a good predictor of malignancy and can help to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, in conjunction with conventional MR sequences. Even though malignant lesions demonstrated significantly lower ADC values than benign lesions, the use of quantitative diffusion remains limited in its utility for distinguishing them because of the significant overlap and wide ranges of ADC values.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.