Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28919838›Full record

ArticleBMC nursing2017

Adherence to precautions for preventing the transmission of microorganisms in primary health care: a qualitative study.

Michely Aparecida Cardoso Maroldi, Adriana Maria da Silva Felix, Ana Angélica Lima Dias, Julia Yaeko Kawagoe, Maria Clara Padoveze, Sílvia Alice Ferreira, Sílvia Helena Zem-Mascarenhas, Stephen Timmons, Rosely Moralez Figueiredo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC nursing, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Michely Aparecida Cardoso MaroldiDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Adriana Maria da Silva FelixEducation Institute, Hospital do Coração (HCor), São Paulo, Brazil.
Ana Angélica Lima DiasDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Julia Yaeko KawagoeAlbert Einstein Instituto Israelita de Ensino e Pesquisa, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Clara PadovezeSchool of Nursing, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-1912-7293
Sílvia Alice FerreiraHospital Infection Division, São Paulo State Health Department, São Paulo, Brazil.
Sílvia Helena Zem-MascarenhasDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.
Stephen TimmonsCentre for Health Innovation, Leadership and Learning (CHILL), Nottingham University Business School, Nottingham, UK.
Rosely Moralez FigueiredoDepartment of Nursing, Federal University of São Carlos, São Carlos, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth care associated infections (HAIs) are a source of concern worldwide. No health service in any country can be considered HAI risk-free. However, there is scarcity of data on the risks to which both patients and health workers are subject in non-hospital settings. The aim of this study was to identify issues that determine the adherence of professionals to precautions for preventing transmission of microorganisms in primary health care.

methodThis was a qualitative study, using focus groups of primary health care staff, in two Brazilian municipalities. The data were analysed using content analysis.

resultsFour focus groups were conducted with 20 professionals (11 community health workers, 5 nursing assistants and 4 nurses), and the analysed content was organized into four thematic categories. These categories are:

conclusionThe study points out the need to provide in-service training for professionals on the transmission of microorganisms in primary health care to ensure adequate level of risk perception and knowledge. Further recommendations include investment to improve infrastructure to facilitate adherence to precautions and to minimize the risk of disease transmission for both patients and health care workers.

Indexed as

AdherenceFocus groupInfection prevention and controlNursingPrimary careQualitative studyStandard precautionsTransmission

Identifiers

PMID28919838
PMCPMC5594588

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.