Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28919730›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2017

A new functional method to choose the target lobe for lung volume reduction in emphysema - comparison with the conventional densitometric method.

Juergen Hetzel, Michael Boeckeler, Marius Horger, Ahmed Ehab, Christopher Kloth, Robert Wagner, Lutz Freitag, Dirk-Jan Slebos, Richard Alexander Lewis, Maik Haentschel

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Juergen HetzelDivision of Haematology, Oncology, Rheumatology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine.
Michael BoeckelerDivision of Haematology, Oncology, Rheumatology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine.
Marius HorgerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology.
Ahmed EhabDivision of Haematology, Oncology, Rheumatology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine.
Christopher KlothDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology.
Robert WagnerDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetology, Angiology, Nephrology and Clinical Chemistry, Department of Internal Medicine, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, Tuebingen, Germany.
Lutz FreitagDivision of Pulmonology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Dirk-Jan SlebosDepartment of Pulmonary Diseases, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands.
Richard Alexander LewisNational Pollen and Aerobiology Research Unit, Institute of Science and the Environment, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Maik HaentschelDivision of Haematology, Oncology, Rheumatology, Immunology and Pulmonology, Department of Internal Medicine.
Center for Rheumatology · USSociety of Interventional Radiology · USUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CHUniversity of Groningen · NLUniversity of Tübingen · DEUniversity of Worcester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLung volume reduction (LVR) improves breathing mechanics by reducing hyperinflation. Lobar selection usually focuses on choosing the most destroyed emphysematous lobes as seen on an inspiratory CT scan. However, it has never been shown to what extent these densitometric CT parameters predict the least deflation of an individual lobe during expiration. The addition of expiratory CT analysis allows measurement of the extent of lobar air trapping and could therefore provide additional functional information for choice of potential treatment targets.

objectivesTo determine lobar vital capacity/lobar total capacity (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter for lobar air trapping using on an inspiratory and expiratory CT scan. To compare lobar selection by LVC/LTC with the established morphological CT density parameters.

methods36 patients referred for endoscopic LVR were studied. LVC/LTC, defined as delta volume over maximum volume of a lobe, was calculated using inspiratory and expiratory CT scans. The CT morphological parameters of mean lung density (MLD), low attenuation volume (LAV), and 15th percentile of Hounsfield units (15%P) were determined on an inspiratory CT scan for each lobe. We compared and correlated LVC/LTC with MLD, LAV, and 15%P.

resultsThere was a weak correlation between the functional parameter LVC/LTC and all inspiratory densitometric parameters. Target lobe selection using lowest lobar deflation (lowest LVC/LTC) correlated with target lobe selection based on lowest MLD in 18 patients (50.0%), with the highest LAV in 13 patients (36.1%), and with the lowest 15%P in 12 patients (33.3%).

conclusionCT-based measurement of deflation (LVC/LTC) as a functional parameter correlates weakly with all densitometric CT parameters on a lobar level. Therefore, morphological criteria based on inspiratory CT densitometry partially reflect the deflation of particular lung lobes, and may be of limited value as a sole predictor for target lobe selection in LVR.

Indexed as

AgedClinical Decision-MakingExhalationFemaleHumansInhalationLungLung Volume MeasurementsMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPredictive Value of TestsPulmonary EmphysemaTotal Lung CapacityVital Capacitychronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseemphysemahigh-resolution computed tomographylung volume reduction

Identifiers

PMID28919730
PMCPMC5586979
OpenAlexW2751809279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.