Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28919712›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2017

Recent developments in the clinical pharmacology of rolapitant: subanalyses in specific populations.

Bernardo Leon Rapoport, Matti Aapro, Martin R Chasen, Karin Jordan, Rudolph M Navari, Ian Schnadig, Lee Schwartzberg

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Bernardo Leon RapoportThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Matti AaproBreast Center, Genolier Cancer Center, Genolier, Switzerland.
Martin R ChasenPalliative Care, William Osler Health Services, Brampton, ON, Canada.
Karin JordanDepartment of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
Rudolph M NavariDivision of Hematology Oncology, University of Alabama School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL, USA.
Ian SchnadigCompass Oncology, US Oncology Research, Tualatin, OR, USA.
Lee SchwartzbergWest Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.
Breast Center · CHCampbell Clinic · USCompass Oncology · USHeidelberg University · DEThe Medical Oncology Centre of Rosebank · ZAUniversity of Alabama · USWilliam Osler Health System · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the involvement of the neurokinin substance P in emesis has led to the development of the neurokinin-1 receptor antagonists (NK-1 RAs) for control of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), in combination with serotonin type 3 receptor antagonists and corticosteroids. The NK-1 RA rolapitant, recently approved in oral formulation, has nanomolar affinity for the NK-1 receptor, as do the other commercially available NK-1 RAs, aprepitant and netupitant. Rolapitant is rapidly absorbed and has a long half-life in comparison to aprepitant and netupitant. All three NK-1 RAs undergo metabolism by cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4, necessitating caution with the concomitant use of CYP3A4 inhibitors, but in contrast to aprepitant and netupitant, rolapitant does not inhibit or induce CYP3A4. However, rolapitant is a moderate inhibitor of CYP2D6, and concomitant use with CYP2D6 substrates with narrow therapeutic indices should be avoided. Aprepitant, netupitant, and rolapitant have all demonstrated efficacy in the control of delayed CINV in patients receiving moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy in randomized controlled trials, including over multiple cycles of chemotherapy. We reviewed recent post hoc analyses of clinical trial data demonstrating that rolapitant is efficacious in the control of CINV in patient populations with specific tumor types, namely, breast cancers, gastrointestinal/colorectal cancers, and lung cancers. In addition, we show that rolapitant has efficacy in the control of CINV in specific age groups of patients receiving chemotherapy (<65 and ≥65 years of age). Overall, the safety profile of rolapitant in these specific patient populations was consistent with that observed in primary analyses of phase 3 trials.

Indexed as

AntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsHalf-LifeHumansNauseaNeoplasmsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSpiro CompoundsVomitingAntiemeticsAntineoplastic AgentsNeurokinin-1 Receptor AntagonistsrolapitantSpiro Compoundschemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingneurokinin-1 receptor antagonistpost hoc analysesrolapitant

Identifiers

PMID28919712
PMCPMC5592904
OpenAlexW2752934452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.