Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28919706›Full record

ReviewDrug design, development and therapy2017

Profile of pembrolizumab in the treatment of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: design development and place in therapy.

Sulsal Haque, Mahender Yellu, Jaskirat Randhawa, Nooshin Hashemi-Sadraei

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Drug design, development and therapy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sulsal HaqueDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
Mahender YelluDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
Jaskirat RandhawaDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
Nooshin Hashemi-SadraeiDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati.
Palmetto Hematology Oncology · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Head and neck squamous cell cancer (HNSCC) is the sixth most common malignancy worldwide, and despite advances in cytotoxic, surgical and radiation techniques, outcomes are still poor in those with both locally advanced and metastatic diseases. The need for development of better therapeutics along with a greater understanding of the relationship between the immune system and malignancies has led to a new therapeutic modality, immune modulators, particularly checkpoint inhibitors in HNSCC. It is now well recognized that HNSCC circumvents crucial pathways utilized by the immune system to escape surveillance. These hijacked pathways include impairing tumor antigen presentation machinery and co-opting checkpoint receptors. This understanding has led to the development of monoclonal antibodies targeting checkpoint receptors and has resulted in promising outcomes in HNSCC. This article describes the mechanisms that HNSCC utilizes to escape immune surveillance, clinical impact of checkpoint inhibitors (with a focus on pembrolizumab), ongoing studies, and future directions.

Indexed as

Antibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalCarcinoma, Squamous CellDrug DesignHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansImmunologic SurveillanceSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntigens, NeoplasmAntineoplastic Agents, Immunologicalpembrolizumabhead and neck cancerimmunotherapyMK-3475pembrolizumab

Identifiers

PMID28919706
PMCPMC5587117
OpenAlexW2752121590

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.