ArticleVeterinary world2017
16S ribosomal RNA sequencing and molecular serotyping of
Article in Veterinary world, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- A standardized, genome-guided MLST scheme forJournal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- HutZ is required for efficient heme utilization and contributes to the pathogenicity ofMicrobiology spectrum · 2023Article
- The Protective Efficacy of an Inactivated Vaccine againstVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Isolation, Serovar Identification, and Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofVeterinary sciences · 2022Article
- Isolation, Identification and Antimicrobial Susceptibility ofArchives of Razi Institute · 2021Article
- Characterization of viral, bacterial, and parasitic causes of disease in small-scale chicken flocks in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam.Poultry science · 2020Article
- Article
- Characterization of emergent Avibacterium paragallinarum strains and the protection conferred by infectious coryza vaccines against them in China.Poultry science · 2019Article
- Development of a lateral flow test for the rapid detection of Avibacterium paragallinarum in chickens suspected of having infectious coryza.BMC veterinary research · 2018Article
- Isolation, identification, and serotyping ofVeterinary world · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThis study was aimed at identifying Indian field isolates of MATERIALS AND
methodsSpecies-specific polymerase chain reaction (HPG-2 PCR), and 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) sequencing were employed for molecular identification. Whereas, multiplex PCR technique was used for serological identification of Indian field isolates of
resultsAll three field isolates were identified as
conclusionHPG-2 PCR, 16S rRNA sequencing, and multiplex PCR are proved to be more accurate, sensitive, and reliable diagnostic tools for molecular and serological identification of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.