Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918762›Full record

ArticleEpidemiology and psychiatric sciences2019

Standard comparison of local mental health care systems in eight European countries.

M R Gutiérrez-Colosía, L Salvador-Carulla, J A Salinas-Pérez, C R García-Alonso, J Cid, D Salazzari, I Montagni, F Tedeschi, G Cetrano, K Chevreul and 11 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The PADRIS-PRESTO cohort: A comprehensive population-based study on mental health in Catalonia.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Acute psychiatric care: approaches to increasing the range of services and improving access and quality of care.World psychiatry : official journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) · 2022
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

M R Gutiérrez-ColosíaPSICOST Research Association,Departamento de Psicología,Universidad Loyola Andalucía,Sevilla,Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2631-0205
L Salvador-CarullaCentre for Mental Health Research,Research School of Population Health College of Medicine,Biology and Environment,Australian National University,Research School of Population Health,63 Eggleston Road,Acton,ACT 2501,Australia.
J A Salinas-PérezPSICOST Research Association,Departamento de Psicología,Universidad Loyola Andalucía,Sevilla,Spain.
C R García-AlonsoDepartamento de Métodos Cuantitativos,Universidad Loyola Andalucía,Sevilla,Spain.
J CidMental Health & Addiction Research Group,IDIBGI-Institut d'Assistència Sanitària,Girona,Spain.
D SalazzariSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurological,Biomedical and Movement Sciences,University of Verona,Italy.
I MontagniUniv. Bordeaux,Inserm,Bordeaux Population Health Research Center UMR1219,Team HEALTHY,F-33000 Bordeaux,France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-0010
F TedeschiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurological,Biomedical and Movement Sciences,University of Verona,Italy.
G CetranoSocial Care Workforce Research Unit,King's Policy Institute,King's College London,London,UK.
K ChevreulUniversité Paris Diderot,Sorbonne,Paris,France.
J KalsethDepartment of Health Research,SINTEF Technology and Society,Trondheim,Norway.
G HagmairIMEHPS.Research,Vienna,Austria.
C StraßmayrIMEHPS.Research,Vienna,Austria.
A L ParkPersonal Social Services Research Unit,LSE Health and Social Care,London School of Economics and Political Science London,UK.
R SfectuInstitute for Economic Forecasting,Bucharest,Romania.
T Ala-NikkolaHelsinki University and Department of Mental Health,National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL),Helsinki,Finland.
J L González-CaballeroDepartment of Statistics and Operations Research,University of Cadiz,Spain.
L RabbiSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurological,Biomedical and Movement Sciences,University of Verona,Italy.
B KalsethDepartment of Health Research,SINTEF Technology and Society,Trondheim,Norway.
F AmaddeoSection of Psychiatry, Department of Neurological,Biomedical and Movement Sciences,University of Verona,Italy.
REFINEMENT Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThere is a need of more quantitative standardised data to compare local Mental Health Systems (MHSs) across international jurisdictions. Problems related to terminological variability and commensurability in the evaluation of services hamper like-with-like comparisons and hinder the development of work in this area. This study was aimed to provide standard assessment and comparison of MHS in selected local areas in Europe, contributing to a better understanding of MHS and related allocation of resources at local level and to lessen the scarcity in standard service comparison in Europe. This study is part of the Seventh Framework programme REFINEMENT (Research on Financing Systems' Effect on the Quality of Mental Health Care in Europe) project.

methodsA total of eight study areas from European countries with different systems of care (Austria, England, Finland, France, Italy, Norway, Romania, Spain) were analysed using a standard open-access classification system (Description and Evaluation of Services for Long Term Care in Europe, DESDE-LTC). All publicly funded services universally accessible to adults (≥18 years) with a psychiatric disorder were coded. Care availability, diversity and capacity were compared across these eight local MHS.

resultsThe comparison of MHS revealed more community-oriented delivery systems in the areas of England (Hampshire) and Southern European countries (Verona - Italy and Girona - Spain). Community-oriented systems with a higher proportion of hospital care were identified in Austria (Industrieviertel) and Scandinavian countries (Sør-Trøndelag in Norway and Helsinki-Uusimaa in Finland), while Loiret (France) was considered as a predominantly hospital-based system. The MHS in Suceava (Romania) was still in transition to community care.

conclusionsThere is a significant variation in care availability and capacity across MHS of local areas in Europe. This information is relevant for understanding the process of implementation of community-oriented mental health care in local areas. Standard comparison of care provision in local areas is important for context analysis and policy planning.

Indexed as

AdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesEfficiency, OrganizationalEuropeHumansMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesResidential FacilitiesCommunity-balanced caremain type of caremental health care comparisonMental Health System

Identifiers

PMID28918762
PMCPMC6998926

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.