Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918605›Full record

ArticlePrimates; journal of primatology2018

Food or threat? Wild capuchin monkeys (Sapajus libidinosus) as both predators and prey of snakes.

Tiago Falótico, Michele P Verderane, Olívia Mendonça-Furtado, Noemi Spagnoletti, Eduardo B Ottoni, Elisabetta Visalberghi, Patrícia Izar

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Primates; journal of primatology, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Fecal bacterial communities of wild black capuchin monkeys (Current research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Tiago FalóticoInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. tfalotico@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0638-1989
Michele P VerderaneInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Olívia Mendonça-FurtadoInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Noemi SpagnolettiIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione del CNR di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Eduardo B OttoniInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
Elisabetta VisalberghiIstituto di Scienze e Tecnologie della Cognizione del CNR di Roma, Rome, Italy.
Patrícia IzarInstitute of Psychology, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2006/07187-5Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2006/07190-6Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2006/51578-9Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2008/52293-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2008/55684-3Sixth Framework Programme 029088
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Snakes present a hazard to primates, both as active predators and by defensive envenomation. This risk might have been a selective pressure on the evolution of primate visual and cognitive systems, leading to several behavioral traits present in human and non-human primates, such as the ability to quickly learn to fear snakes. Primates seldom prey on snakes, and humans are one of the few primate species that do. We report here another case, the wild capuchin monkey (Sapajus libidinosus), which preys on snakes. We hypothesized that capuchin monkeys, due to their behavioral plasticity, and cognitive and visual skills, would be capable of discriminating dangerous and non-dangerous snakes and behave accordingly. We recorded the behavioral patterns exhibited toward snakes in two populations of S. libidinosus living 320 km apart in Piauí, Brazil. As expected, capuchins have a fear reaction to dangerous snakes (usually venomous or constricting snakes), presenting mobbing behavior toward them. In contrast, they hunt and consume non-dangerous snakes without presenting the fear response. Our findings support the tested hypothesis that S. libidinosus are capable of differentiating snakes by level of danger: on the one hand they protect themselves from dangerous snakes, on the other hand they take opportunities to prey on non-dangerous snakes. Since capuchins and humans are both predators and prey of snakes, further studies of this complex relationship may shed light on the evolution of these traits in the human lineage.

Indexed as

FearFood ChainPredatory BehaviorAge FactorsAnimalsBrazilCebinaeDietFemaleMaleSex FactorsSnakesEvolutionMobbingPredationPrimatesSnake detectionTool use

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.