Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918572›Full record

ArticleJournal of muscle research and cell motility2017

Spot light on skeletal muscles: optogenetic stimulation to understand and restore skeletal muscle function.

Tobias van Bremen, Thorsten Send, Philipp Sasse, Tobias Bruegmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of muscle research and cell motility, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Towards the clinical translation of optogenetic skeletal muscle stimulation.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2020
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Editorial on EMC 2017 special issue.Journal of muscle research and cell motility · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tobias van BremenDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2112-7409
Thorsten SendDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6105-7121
Philipp SasseInstitute of Physiology I, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. philipp.sasse@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-8502-9472
Tobias BruegmannInstitute of Physiology I, Medical Faculty, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. tbruegmann@uni-bonn.de.ORCID 0000-0002-6930-9634
University Hospital Bonn · DEUniversity of Bonn · DE

Funding

BONFOR program of the Mediacl Faculty, University of Bonn O-162.0011Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 13N14087Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft Research Trainings Group 1873Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SA-1785/7-1Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft SA-1785/9-1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Damage of peripheral nerves results in paralysis of skeletal muscle. Currently, the only treatment option to restore proper function is electrical stimulation of the innervating nerve or of the skeletal muscles directly. However this approach has low spatial and temporal precision leading to co-activation of antagonistic muscles and lacks cell-type selectivity resulting in pain or discomfort by stimulation of sensible nerves. In contrast to electrical stimulation, optogenetic methods enable spatially confined and cell-type selective stimulation of cells expressing the light sensitive channel Channelrhodopsin-2 with precise temporal control over the membrane potential. Herein we summarize the current knowledge about the use of this technology to control skeletal muscle function with the focus on the direct, non-neuronal stimulation of muscle fibers. The high temporal flexibility of using light pulses allows new stimulation patterns to investigate skeletal muscle physiology. Furthermore, the high spatial precision of focused illumination was shown to be beneficial for selective stimulation of distinct nearby muscle groups. Finally, the cell-type specific expression of the light-sensitive effector proteins in muscle fibers will allow pain-free stimulation and open new options for clinical treatments. Therefore, we believe that direct optogenetic stimulation of skeletal muscles is a very potent method for basic scientists that also harbors several distinct advantages over electrical stimulation to be considered for clinical use in the future.

Indexed as

Electric Stimulation TherapyMembrane PotentialsMuscle ContractionMuscle Fibers, SkeletalPeripheral Nerve InjuriesAnimalsHumansOptogeneticsChannelrhodopsin-2Excitation-contraction-couplingLaryngeal pacemakersOptogeneticsSkeletal muscle

Identifiers

PMID28918572
OpenAlexW2755528663

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.