Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918538›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in microbiology and immunology

Genetic Manipulation of Borrelia Spp.

Dan Drecktrah, D Scott Samuels

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in microbiology and immunology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ThemBio · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Antigen-Specific CD4 T Cell and B Cell Responses to Borrelia burgdorferi.Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950) · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Genetic Manipulation ofCurrent issues in molecular biology · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Protein Secretion in Spirochetes.Microbiology spectrum · 2019
    Article
  14. Assessing the Contribution of an HtrA Family Serine Protease DuringFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Dan DrecktrahDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. dan.drecktrah@mso.umt.edu.
D Scott SamuelsDivision of Biological Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 59812, USA. samuels@mso.umt.edu.

Funding

Regulation of Gene Expression in Borrelia burgdorferiR01AI051486 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA · PI SAMUELS, D. SCOTT · 2003 to 2018
$5.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI051486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The spirochetes Borrelia (Borreliella) burgdorferi and Borrelia hermsii, the etiologic agents of Lyme disease and relapsing fever, respectively, cycle in nature between an arthropod vector and a vertebrate host. They have extraordinarily unusual genomes that are highly segmented and predominantly linear. The genetic analyses of Lyme disease spirochetes have become increasingly more sophisticated, while the age of genetic investigation in the relapsing fever spirochetes is just dawning. Molecular tools available for B. burgdorferi and related species range from simple selectable markers and gene reporters to state-of-the-art inducible gene expression systems that function in the animal model and high-throughput mutagenesis methodologies, despite nearly overwhelming experimental obstacles. This armamentarium has empowered borreliologists to build a formidable genetic understanding of the cellular physiology of the spirochete and the molecular pathogenesis of Lyme disease.

Indexed as

Genetic EngineeringAnimalsBacterial ProteinsBorreliaBorrelia burgdorferiLyme DiseaseMolecular BiologyRelapsing FeverBacterial Proteins

Identifiers

PMID28918538
PMCPMC5857249

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.