Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918523›Full record

SynthesisKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2018

Focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of localized cartilage defects of the femoral condyles: a systematic review of clinical studies.

Andreas Fuchs, Helge Eberbach, Kaywan Izadpanah, Gerrit Bode, Norbert P Südkamp, Matthias J Feucht

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Surface texture analysis of different focal knee resurfacing implants after 6 and 12 months in vivo in a goat model.Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient-specific metal implants for focal chondral and osteochondral lesions in the knee; excellent clinical results at 2 years.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2021
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. UniCAP offers a long term treatment for middle-aged patients, who are not revised within the first 9 years.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Andreas FuchsDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
Helge EberbachDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
Kaywan IzadpanahDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
Gerrit BodeDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
Norbert P SüdkampDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany.
Matthias J FeuchtDepartment of Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Medical Center - Albert-Ludwigs-University of Freiburg, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79016, Freiburg, Germany. matthias.feucht@gmx.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo systematically review the results of focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of isolated cartilage defects of the femoral condyles.

methodsA systematic electronic search of the PubMed database and the Cochrane Library was performed in April 2017 to identify studies that reported clinical or radiographic outcome of focal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis for the treatment of isolated cartilage defects of the femoral condyles. Included studies were abstracted regarding study characteristics, patient demographics, prosthetic device and location, indications and contraindications, and outcome measures. Outcome of interest included functional outcome scores, radiographic measures, complications, re-operations, and conversion to arthroplasty. The methodologic quality of the included studies was assessed with the Coleman Methodology Score.

resultsSix studies with a total of 186 patients met the inclusion criteria. Five studies were level IV evidence, and one was level III. The methodologic quality of the included studies was good, with a mean Coleman Methodology Score of 78. Two different implants were used: the HemiCAP

conclusionsFocal metallic inlay resurfacing prosthesis seems to be a viable option for a carefully selected group of patients. Significant improvement in knee function and pain was observed in most patients. Uncertainty remains with regard to progression of osteoarthritis because of conflicting results and inconsistent reporting. One out of five patients has to be converted to arthroplasty after an average of 4 years. However, compared to the UniCAP LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic review of level III and IV studies, Level IV.

Indexed as

Knee ProsthesisArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeCartilageCartilage DiseasesDisease ProgressionFemurFollow-Up StudiesHumansKnee JointOsteoarthritisPainPlastic Surgery ProceduresReoperationTreatment OutcomeArthroplastyCartilageInlay prosthesisKneeOsteoarthritisResurfacing

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.