Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918439›Full record

ArticleInternational archives of occupational and environmental health2018

The Gulf oil spill, miscarriage, and infertility: the GROWH study.

Emily W Harville, Arti Shankar, Leah Zilversmit, Pierre Buekens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International archives of occupational and environmental health, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Environmental factors in declining human fertility.Nature reviews. Endocrinology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Self-Reported Oil Spill Exposure and Pregnancy Complications: The GROWH Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily W HarvilleDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, STE 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112-2715, USA. harville@tulane.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-0922
Arti ShankarGlobal Biostatistics and Data Science, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA.
Leah ZilversmitDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, STE 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112-2715, USA.
Pierre BuekensDepartment of Epidemiology, Tulane University School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, 1440 Canal St. #8318, STE 2000, New Orleans, LA, 70112-2715, USA.

Funding

Tracking & Evaluation CoreU54GM104940 · NIGMS · LSU PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CTR · PI JUDD E SHELLITO · 2012 to 2026
$69.1M
Transdisciplinary Research Consortium for Gulf Resilience on Women's HealthU19ES020677 · NIEHS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI LICHTVELD, MAUREEN Y. · 2011 to 2015
$7.1M
NIEHS NIH HHS U19 ES020677NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM104940
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine whether reported exposure to the Gulf oil spill (2010) was related to reproductive reported miscarriage or infertility.

methods1524 women aged 18-45 recruited through prenatal and Women, Infant, and Children (WIC) clinics, and community events were interviewed about their experience of the oil spill and reproductive history. 1434 women had information on outcomes of at least one pregnancy, and 633 on a pregnancy both before and after the spill. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the relationship between contact with oil and economic and social consequences of the spill with postponement of pregnancy, miscarriage, and infertility (time to pregnancy >12 months or reported fertility issues), with adjustment for age, race, BMI, smoking, and socioeconomic status. Results were compared for pregnancies occurring prior to and after the oil spill.

results77 (5.1%) women reported postponing pregnancy due to the oil spill, which was more common in those with high contact with oil or overall high exposure (aOR 2.92, 95% CI 1.31-6.51). An increased risk of miscarriage was found with any exposure to the oil spill (aOR, 1.54, 95% CI 1.17-2.02). Fertility issues were more common in the overall most highly exposed women (aOR 1.88, 1.19-2.95), when the data were limited to those with pregnancies before and after. However, no particular aspect of oil spill exposure was strongly associated with the outcomes, and effects were almost as strong for pregnancies prior to the oil spill.

conclusionsThe oil spill appears to have affected reproductive decision-making. The evidence is not strong that exposure to the oil spill was associated with miscarriage or infertility.

Indexed as

Abortion, SpontaneousAdolescentDecision MakingDisastersEnvironmental ExposureFemaleGulf of AmericaHumansInfertilityLouisianaMiddle AgedPetroleum PollutionPregnancyPrevalenceAbortionFertilityPetroleumPregnancySpontaneous

Identifiers

PMID28918439
PMCPMC5754231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.