Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918409›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2017

Qualitative interview study of parents' perspectives, concerns and experiences of the management of lower respiratory tract infections in children in primary care.

Amy Halls, Catherine Van't Hoff, Paul Little, Theo Verheij, Geraldine M Leydon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding refugee and immigrant health literacy and beliefs toward antimicrobial resistance.Antimicrobial stewardship & healthcare epidemiology : ASHE · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 5 countries.

Amy HallsFaculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6625-3073
Catherine Van't HoffEducation Centre, Royal Bournemouth Hospital, Bournemouth, UK.
Paul LittleFaculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Theo VerheijDepartment of General Practice, University Medical Center Utrecht, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Geraldine M LeydonFaculty of Medicine, Academic Unit of Primary Care and Population Sciences, Aldermoor Health Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Primary Health Care · QARoyal Bournemouth Hospital · GBUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo explore parents' perspectives, concerns and experiences of the management of lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) in children in primary care.

designQualitative semistructured interview study.

settingUK primary care.

participants23 parents of children aged 6 months to 10 years presenting with LRTI in primary care.

methodThematic analysis of semistructured interviews (either in person or by telephone) conducted with parents to explore their experiences and views on their children being prescribed antibiotics for LRTI.

resultsFour major themes were identified and these are perspectives on: (1) infection, (2) antibiotic use, (3) the general practitioner (GP) appointment and (4) decision making around prescribing. Symptomatic relief was a key concern: the most troublesome symptoms were cough, breathing difficulty, fever and malaise. Many parents were reluctant to use self-care medication, tended to support antibiotic use and believed they are effective for symptoms, illness duration and for preventing complications. However, parental expectations varied from a desire for reassurance and advice to an explicit preference for an antibiotic prescription. These preferences were shaped by: (1) the age of the child, with younger children perceived as more vulnerable because of their greater difficulty in communicating, and concerns about rapid deterioration; (2) the perceived severity of the illness; and (3) disruption to daily routine. When there was disagreement with the GP, parents described feeling dismissed, and they were critical of inconsistent prescribing when they reconsult. When agreement between the parent and the doctor featured, parents described a feeling of relief and legitimation for consulting, feeling reassured that the illness did indeed warrant a doctor's attention.

conclusionSymptomatic relief is a major concern for parents. Careful exploration of expectations, and eliciting worries about key symptoms and impact on daily life will be needed to help parents understand when a no antibiotic recommendation or delayed antibiotic recommendation is made.

Indexed as

Decision MakingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnti-Bacterial AgentsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantMaleMiddle AgedParentsPrimary Health CareQualitative ResearchRespiratory Tract InfectionsSelf CareAnti-Bacterial Agentsantibioticsinterviewsprimary carequalitative research

Identifiers

PMID28918409
PMCPMC5640115
OpenAlexW2755337917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.