Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918284›Full record

ArticleDifferentiation; research in biological diversity

New insights into human female reproductive tract development.

Stanley J Robboy, Takeshi Kurita, Laurence Baskin, Gerald R Cunha

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Differentiation; research in biological diversity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
62citing papers in PubMed
11.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

62 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. HMMRCell discovery · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Histogenesis of the Uterine Horn in the Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  13. The Role of Adenogenesis Factors in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Decoding Müllerian Duct Epithelial Regionalization.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Urogenital sinus malformation: From development to management.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023
    Review

2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stanley J RobboyDepartment of Pathology, Duke University, Davison Building, Box 3712, Durham, NC 27710, United States. Electronic address: stanley.robboy@duke.edu.
Takeshi KuritaDepartment of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State University, 460 W. 12th Avenue, 812 Biomedical Research Tower, Columbus, OH 43210, United States.
Laurence BaskinDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
Gerald R CunhaDepartment of Urology, University of California, 400 Parnassus Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94143, United States.
University of California, San Francisco · USDuke University · US

Funding

Hypospadias Differentiation and Endocrine DisruptorsR01DK058105 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI BASKIN, LAURENCE · 2003 to 2015
$2.7M
Molecular Etiology of Cervicovaginal Adenosis by in Utero Hormone ExposureR01CA154358 · NCI · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KURITA, TAKESHI · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA154358NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK058105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We present a detailed review of the embryonic and fetal development of the human female reproductive tract utilizing specimens from the 5th through the 22nd gestational week. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as immunohistochemical stains were used to study the development of the human uterine tube, endometrium, myometrium, uterine cervix and vagina. Our study revisits and updates the classical reports of Koff (1933) and Bulmer (1957) and presents new data on development of human vaginal epithelium. Koff proposed that the upper 4/5ths of the vagina is derived from Müllerian epithelium and the lower 1/5th derived from urogenital sinus epithelium, while Bulmer proposed that vaginal epithelium derives solely from urogenital sinus epithelium. These conclusions were based entirely upon H&E stained sections. A central player in human vaginal epithelial development is the solid vaginal plate, which arises from the uterovaginal canal (fused Müllerian ducts) cranially and squamous epithelium of urogenital sinus caudally. Since Müllerian and urogenital sinus epithelium cannot be unequivocally identified in H&E stained sections, we used immunostaining for PAX2 (reactive with Müllerian epithelium) and FOXA1 (reactive with urogenital sinus epithelium). By this technique, the PAX2/FOXA1 boundary was located at the extreme caudal aspect of the vaginal plate at 12 weeks. During the ensuing weeks, the PAX2/FOXA1 boundary progressively extended cranially such that by 21 weeks the entire vaginal epithelium was FOXA1-reactive and PAX2-negative. This observation supports Bulmer's proposal that human vaginal epithelium derives solely from urogenital sinus epithelium. Clearly, the development of the human vagina is far more complex than previously envisioned and appears to be distinctly different in many respects from mouse vaginal development.

Indexed as

AnimalsEmbryonic DevelopmentEpitheliumFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaHumansMiceMullerian DuctsPAX2 Transcription FactorReproductionVaginaFOXA1 protein, humanHepatocyte Nuclear Factor 3-alphaPAX2 protein, humanPAX2 Transcription FactorCervixHuman Müllerian ductUrogenital sinusUterovaginal canalUterusVagina

Identifiers

PMID28918284
PMCPMC5712241
OpenAlexW2742881784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.