ArticleDifferentiation; research in biological diversity
New insights into human female reproductive tract development.
Article in Differentiation; research in biological diversity. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 62 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
62 citing papers in PubMed, 107 citations in OpenAlex.
- HMMRCell discovery · 2026Article
- The junction between the midgut and hindgut co-localizes with the rectosigmoid junction.Journal of anatomy · 2026Article
- Segmental specification of the human female fetal reproductive tract revealed by spatiotemporal dynamics.Nature cell biology · 2026Article
- A transient epithelial plasticity state defines the developmental window for uterine gland specification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- The Impact of Congenital Anomalies of the Male and Female Reproductive Organs on Infertility and Recurrent Pregnancy Loss: A Review.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Unraveling the Genetic Mysteries of Müllerian Anomalies: Research Approaches and Clinical Significance.Clinical genetics · 2026Review
- The pathoanatomy of cancer: order in paradox.EBioMedicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Advances and challenges of endometrial organoids in modeling endometrial function: basic, clinical, and future perspectives.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- The Development of the Human Female Reproductive Tract: Part 2-Vagina.Clinical anatomy (New York, N.Y.) · 2026Article
- Progesterone regulation of cervix ripening in preterm and term birth in mice.Reproduction (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Histogenesis of the Uterine Horn in the Domestic Cat (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- The Role of Adenogenesis Factors in the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Decoding Müllerian Duct Epithelial Regionalization.Molecular reproduction and development · 2025Review
- Review
- Recent Advances in Vaginal Atresia: A Literature Review.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- From cervix to multisite: Detection of lower genital tract lesions in a 10-year cross-sectional colposcopy clinic study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Genetics of Mayer-Rokitansky-Küster-Hauser (MRKH) syndrome: advancements and implications.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2024Review
- Urogenital sinus malformation: From development to management.Intractable & rare diseases research · 2023Review
2 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We present a detailed review of the embryonic and fetal development of the human female reproductive tract utilizing specimens from the 5th through the 22nd gestational week. Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) as well as immunohistochemical stains were used to study the development of the human uterine tube, endometrium, myometrium, uterine cervix and vagina. Our study revisits and updates the classical reports of Koff (1933) and Bulmer (1957) and presents new data on development of human vaginal epithelium. Koff proposed that the upper 4/5ths of the vagina is derived from Müllerian epithelium and the lower 1/5th derived from urogenital sinus epithelium, while Bulmer proposed that vaginal epithelium derives solely from urogenital sinus epithelium. These conclusions were based entirely upon H&E stained sections. A central player in human vaginal epithelial development is the solid vaginal plate, which arises from the uterovaginal canal (fused Müllerian ducts) cranially and squamous epithelium of urogenital sinus caudally. Since Müllerian and urogenital sinus epithelium cannot be unequivocally identified in H&E stained sections, we used immunostaining for PAX2 (reactive with Müllerian epithelium) and FOXA1 (reactive with urogenital sinus epithelium). By this technique, the PAX2/FOXA1 boundary was located at the extreme caudal aspect of the vaginal plate at 12 weeks. During the ensuing weeks, the PAX2/FOXA1 boundary progressively extended cranially such that by 21 weeks the entire vaginal epithelium was FOXA1-reactive and PAX2-negative. This observation supports Bulmer's proposal that human vaginal epithelium derives solely from urogenital sinus epithelium. Clearly, the development of the human vagina is far more complex than previously envisioned and appears to be distinctly different in many respects from mouse vaginal development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.