Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28918262›Full record

ReviewNeuroscience2018

Circuit changes in motor cortex during motor skill learning.

Andrew E Papale, Bryan M Hooks

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neuroscience, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 157 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Brain Plasticity in Patients with Spinal Cord Injuries: A Systematic Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Dietary Fenbendazole Treatment Does Not Impair Skilled Forelimb Motor Function in C57BL/6J Mice.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Neuronal hypofunction and network dysfunction in a mouse model at an early stage of tauopathy.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew E PapaleDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: papalea@pitt.edu.
Bryan M HooksDepartment of Neurobiology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, United States. Electronic address: hooksm@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Motor Cortex Microcircuitry Underlying Movement Control and LearningR01NS103993 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI HOOKS, BRYAN MCIVER · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Activity's Role in Retinogeniculate Synapse MaturationF31NS048630 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI HOOKS, BRYAN M · 2004 to 2006
$77k
NINDS NIH HHS F31 NS048630NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS103993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Motor cortex is important for motor skill learning, particularly the dexterous skills necessary for our favorite sports and careers. We are especially interested in understanding how plasticity in motor cortex contributes to skill learning. Although human studies have been helpful in understanding the importance of motor cortex in learning skilled tasks, animal models are necessary for achieving a detailed understanding of the circuitry underlying these behaviors and the changes that occur during training. We review data from these models to try to identify sites of plasticity in motor cortex, focusing on rodents asa model system. Rodent neocortex contains well-differentiated motor and sensory regions, as well as neurons expressing similar genetic markers to many of the same circuit components in human cortex. Furthermore, rodents have circuit mapping tools for labeling, targeting, and manipulating these cell types as circuit nodes. Crucially, the projection from rodent primary somatosensory cortex to primary motor cortex is a well-studied corticocortical projection and a model of sensorimotor integration. We first summarize some of the descending pathways involved in making dexterous movements, including reaching. We then describe local and long-range circuitry in mouse motor cortex, summarizing structural and functional changes associated with motor skill acquisition. We then address which specific connections might be responsible for plasticity. For insight into the range of plasticity mechanisms employed by cortex, we review plasticity in sensory systems. The similarities and differences between motor cortex plasticity and critical periods of plasticity in sensory systems are discussed.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansLearningMotor CortexMotor SkillsNerve NetNeural InhibitionNeuronal Plasticitycortical circuitscortical inhibitionmotor cortexmotor learningsynaptic plasticity

Identifiers

PMID28918262
PMCPMC5762136
OpenAlexW2756240130

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.