Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28917592›Full record

Trial reportBrain stimulation

Prefrontal versus motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effects on post-surgical opioid use.

Jeffrey J Borckardt, Scott T Reeves, Cole Milliken, Brittan Carter, Thomas I Epperson, Ryan J Gunselman, Alok Madan, H Del Schutte, Harry A Demos, Mark S George

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Targeting Prefrontal Cortex Dysfunction in Pain.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Substance Use and Addiction in Athletes: The Case for Neuromodulation and Beyond.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Neocortical circuits in pain and pain relief.Nature reviews. Neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  11. New Developments in Non-invasive Brain Stimulation in Chronic Pain.Current physical medicine and rehabilitation reports · 2020
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeffrey J BorckardtMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA. Electronic address: borckard@musc.edu.
Scott T ReevesMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Cole MillikenMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Brittan CarterMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Thomas I EppersonMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Ryan J GunselmanMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Alok MadanMenninger Clinic, Houston, TX, USA.
H Del SchutteMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Harry A DemosMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.
Mark S GeorgeMedical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

Funding

Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in the Management of Post-operative PainR21AR061755 · NIAMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI BORCKARDT, JEFFREY J · 2012 to 2013
$360k
NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR061755
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain is often a complaint that precedes total knee arthroplasty (TKA), however the procedure itself is associated with considerable post-operative pain lasting days to weeks which can predict longer-term surgical outcomes. Previously, we reported significant opioid-sparing effects of motor cortex transcranial direct current stimulation from a single-blind trial. In the present study, we used double-blind methodology to compare motor cortex tDCS and prefrontal cortex tDCS to both sham and active-control (active electrodes over non-pain modulating brain areas) tDCS.

methods58 patients undergoing unilateral TKA were randomly assigned to receive 4 20-min sessions (a total of 80 min) of tDCS (2 mA) post-surgery with electrodes placed to create 4 groups: 1) MOTOR (n = 14); anode-motor/cathode-right prefrontal, 2) PREFRONTAL (n = 16); anode-left-prefrontal/cathode-right-sensory, 3) ACTIVE-CONTROL (n = 15); anode-left-temporal-occipital junction/cathode-medial-anterior-premotor-area, and 4) SHAM (n = 13); 0 mA-current stimulation using placements 1 or 2. Patient controlled analgesia (PCA; hydromorphone) use was tracked during the ∼72-h post-surgery.

resultsPatients in the sham group and the active-control group used 15.4 mg (SD = 14.1) and 16.0 mg (SD = 9.7) of PCA hydromorphone respectively. There was no difference between the slopes of the cumulative PCA usage curves between these two groups (p = 0.25; ns). Patients in the prefrontal tDCS group used an average of 11.7 mg (SD = 5.0) of PCA hydromporhone, and the slope of the cumulative PCA usage curve was significantly lower than sham (p < 0.0001). However, patients in the motor tDCS group used an average of 19.6 mg (SD = 11.9) hydromorphone and the slope of the PCA use curve was significantly higher than sham (p < 0.0001).

conclusionsResults from this double-blind cortical-target-optimization study suggest that anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the left prefrontal cortex may be a reasonable approach to reducing post-TKA opioid requirements. Given the unexpected finding that motor cortex failed to produce an opioid sparing effect in this follow-up trial, further research in the area of post-operative cortical stimulation is still needed.

Indexed as

AgedAnalgesics, OpioidDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotor CortexPain MeasurementPostoperative PainPrefrontal CortexSingle-Blind MethodTranscranial Direct Current StimulationTreatment OutcomeAnalgesics, OpioidKnee painMotor cortexOpioidPainPrefrontal cortexSurgical paintDCS

Identifiers

PMID28917592
PMCPMC5675751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.