ArticleSaudi medical journal2017
Accuracy of preoperative fine needle aspiration in diagnosis of malignant parotid tumors.
Article in Saudi medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficiency of Fine-Needle Aspiration (FNA) in Relation to Tru-Cut Biopsy of Lateral Neck Swellings.Cureus · 2024Article
- The Usefulness of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the Management of Parotid Gland Masses at a Tertiary Academic Hospital.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2023Article
- Article
- The Diagnostic Value of Fine Needle Aspiration Biopsy in Parotid Tumors.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2022Article
- Role of fine needle aspiration in malignant parotid tumors at a single-center experience: A retrospective cohort study.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2021Article
- Fine needle aspiration vs. surgical pathology specimen in salivary gland tumors: a study of diagnostic accuracy and predictive value.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo determine the diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration (FNA) for detecting malignant parotid tumors. Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all patients diagnosed with benign or malignant parotid gland tumors in King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, between January 2004 and May 2015. The records of 65 subjects were obtained. Histopathological findings and data from FNA examinations were obtained from medical records. Twenty-three subjects were excluded due to missing FNA, histopathology results or both. The sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and positive predictive value of FNA for detecting malignant lesions were estimated and compared with the gold standard, histopathology. Results: The specimens of 5 cases were insufficient for diagnosis; therefore, 38 cases were diagnosed by FNA and had histopathological reports. Three cases were diagnosed positive for cancer using histopathology and missed by FNA, 3 were diagnosed as malignant lesions using both FNA and histopathology, and 32 cases were determined benign based on histopathology and FNA analysis. The total prevalence of parotid malignancies was 15.8%. The sensitivity of FNA for detecting malignancy was 50%, and the specificity was 100%; with a positive predictive value of 100% and negative predictive value of 91.4%. Conclusion: Fine needle aspiration is a highly specific, but only moderately sensitive test. We support the use of this method as an initial tool for diagnosing parotid gland malignancies, as it is a safe, rapid, and painless procedure, compared to histopathology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.