Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28916956›Full record

ReviewSports medicine - open2017

Transitioning to Minimal Footwear: a Systematic Review of Methods and Future Clinical Recommendations.

Joe P Warne, Allison H Gruber

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Sports medicine - open, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06106958 (The Effects of Foot Rehabilitation And Minimalist Shoes), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06106958 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Foot Rehabilitation And Minimalist Shoes (FRAMES) on Pain, Strength, and Function in Adults With Plantar Fasciopathy

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of VirginiaRan2024 to 2025Enrolled37ConditionsPlantar Fascitis, Plantar Fasciopathy, Plantar Fasciitis of Both Feet, Plantar Fasciitis of Right FootArmsHome Exercise Program, Minimalist Shoes
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Joe P WarneDepartment of Applied Science, Institute of Technology Tallaght, Blessington Rd, Dublin 24, Ireland. Joe.warne@ittdublin.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4359-8132
Allison H GruberDepartment of Kinesiology, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent interest in barefoot running has led to the development of minimalist running shoes that are popular in distance runners. A careful transition to these shoes has been suggested and examined in the literature. However, no guidelines based on systematic evidence have been presented. The purpose of this review is to systematically examine the methods employed in the literature to transition to minimal footwear (MFW), as well as the outcomes to these studies in distance runners. In addition, MFW transition guidelines for future clinical practice will be presented based on observations from this review.

methodsA systematic database search was employed using PubMed online as the primary database. Twenty papers were included in the final review.

resultsAll studies implemented a prospective transition design to MFW with a detail of this transition provided, which increased MFW exposure up to an average of 60% (30-100%) at completion. Only 8/20 studies included injury prevention exercises, and 9/20 included gait retraining. The main outcomes of this transition included limited positive evidence of transitioning into MFW for running economy (n = 4 studies) and muscle development (n = 5). The injury incidence comparing running during the MFW transition (17.9 injuries per 100 participants) to matched participants in conventional running shoes (13.4 injuries per 100) appears equivocal (p = 0.219; effect size phi (φ) = 0.06 [very small]). Finally, several important recommendations for clinical practice and future research have been presented.

conclusionsIt is hoped that this paper will present important first steps in unifying the process of transitioning to MFW, both for academic and clinical use.

Identifiers

PMID28916956
PMCPMC5602809

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.