Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28916890›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology2019

Coronary calcium score influences referral for invasive coronary angiography after normal myocardial perfusion SPECT.

Shu Yokota, Mohamed Mouden, Jan Paul Ottervanger, Elsemiek Engbers, Pieter L Jager, Jorik R Timmer, Siert Knollema

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. How will lung cancer screening and lung nodule management change the diagnostic and surgical lung cancer landscape?European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2024
    Review
  5. Machine learning based model to diagnose obstructive coronary artery disease using calcium scoring, PET imaging, and clinical data.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  6. The impact of coronary calcium score as an addition to myocardial perfusion imaging in altering clinical management (ICCAMPA trial).Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review of cardiovascular imaging in the Journal of Nuclear Cardiology 2019: Positron emission tomography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2020
    Review
  10. Use of coronary artery calcium scanning as a triage for invasive coronary angiography.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Impact of coronary artery calcium testing on patient management.Journal of cardiovascular computed tomography
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Shu YokotaDepartments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Mohamed MoudenDepartments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands. m.mouden@isala.nl.
Jan Paul OttervangerDepartments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Elsemiek EngbersDepartments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Pieter L JagerNuclear Medicine, Isala hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Jorik R TimmerDepartments of Cardiology, Isala hospital, Dr. Van Heesweg 2, 8025 AB, Zwolle, The Netherlands.
Siert KnollemaNuclear Medicine, Isala hospital, Zwolle, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn patients with normal SPECT but persistent complaints, invasive angiography may exclude obstructive coronary disease. We assessed whether high coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores are associated with increased referral for invasive angiography following normal SPECT. METHODS AND

results2286 consecutive patients (mean age 60 ± 12, 39% male) with normal SPECT were assessed. All patients underwent simultaneous CAC scoring. Patients were categorized into four groups based on their CAC score: CAC = 0 (n = 694), CAC 1 to 100 (n = 891), CAC 101 to 400 (n = 368), and CAC >400 (n = 333). The decision to perform angiography was left to the discretion of treating physician. Follow-up angiography was confined to the first 60 days after SPECT. Occurrence of MACE (late revascularization, myocardial infarction or death) was recorded. Overall, 100 patients (4.4%) underwent early angiography with increasing rates in higher CAC score groups (1.0%, 2.6%, 8.4%, and 11.7%), respectively, P < .001). A CAC score >400 (OR 3.56, 95% CI 2.19 to 5.77, P < .001) was independently associated with referral to angiography. Similarly, CAC score >400 was an independent predictor for MACE (HR 9.26, 95% CI 5.06 to 16.93). Early angiography did not influence prognosis (HR 1.57, 95% CI 0.91 to 2.73).

conclusionsCAC scoring impacts clinical decision-making and increases referral rates for invasive angiography after normal SPECT.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonAgedCalcinosisCalciumCardiologyCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHeartHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisCalciumcoronary artery calcium scoringinvasive coronary angiographymyocardial perfusion imagingSingle-photon emission computed tomographystable coronary artery disease

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.