Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28916858›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018

An endoscopic mucosal grading system is predictive of leak in stapled rectal anastomoses.

Sarath Sujatha-Bhaskar, Mehraneh D Jafari, Mark Hanna, Christina Y Koh, Colette S Inaba, Steven D Mills, Joseph C Carmichael, Ninh T Nguyen, Michael J Stamos, Alessio Pigazzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Risks of anastomotic leakage in patients with colorectal cancer after operation and how to effectively avoid it.Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sarath Sujatha-BhaskarDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Mehraneh D JafariDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Mark HannaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Christina Y KohDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Colette S InabaDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Steven D MillsDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Joseph C CarmichaelDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Ninh T NguyenDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Michael J StamosDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA.
Alessio PigazziDepartment of Surgery, University of California, Irvine, 333 City Blvd W. Suite 850, Orange, CA, 92868, USA. apigazzi@uci.edu.
University of California, Irvine · USUniversity of California, Irvine Medical Center · US

Funding

University of California Health Participation in the National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR001414 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI COOPER, DAN M, VILAIN, ERIC J. · 2015 to 2023
$35.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001414
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnastomotic leak is a devastating postoperative complication following rectal anastomoses associated with significant clinical and oncological implications. As a result, there is a need for novel intraoperative methods that will help predict anastomotic leak.

methodsFrom 2011 to 2014, patient undergoing rectal anastomoses by colorectal surgeons at our institution underwent prospective application of intraoperative flexible endoscopy with mucosal grading. Retrospective review of patient medical records was performed. After creation of the colorectal anastomosis, application of a three-tier endoscopic mucosal grading system occurred. Grade 1 was defined as circumferentially normal appearing peri-anastomotic mucosa. Grade 2 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving <30% of either the colon or rectal mucosa. Grade 3 was defined as ischemia or congestion involving >30% of the colon or rectal mucosa or ischemia/congestion involving both sides of the staple line.

resultsFrom 2011 to 2014, a total of 106 patients were reviewed. Grade 1 anastomoses were created in 92 (86.7%) patients and Grade 2 anastomoses were created in 10 (9.4%) patients. All 4 (3.8%) Grade 3 patients underwent immediate intraoperative anastomosis takedown and re-creation, with subsequent re-classification as Grade 1. Demographic and comorbidity data were similar between Grade 1 and Grade 2 patients. Anastomotic leak rate for the entire cohort was 12.2%. Grade 1 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 9.4% (9/96) and Grade 2 patients demonstrated a leak rate of 40% (4/10). Multivariate logistic regression associated Grade 2 classification with an increased risk of anastomotic leak (OR 4.09, 95% CI 1.21-13.63, P = 0.023).

conclusionEndoscopic mucosal grading is a feasible intraoperative technique that has a role following creation of a rectal anastomosis. Identification of a Grade 2 or Grade 3 anastomosis should provoke strong consideration for immediate intraoperative revision.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalAdultAgedAnastomotic LeakEndoscopyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRectumRetrospective StudiesSurgical StaplingAnastomotic leakColorectalEndoscopyMucosal grading

Identifiers

PMID28916858
PMCPMC6282754
OpenAlexW2755558316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.