Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28916647›Full record

ArticleG3 (Bethesda, Md.)2017

The Effect of Common Inversion Polymorphisms

Erik Lavington, Andrew D Kern

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in G3 (Bethesda, Md.), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Genomic structural variation contributes to evolved changes in gene expression in high-altitude Tibetan sheep.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Genomic architecture of supergenes: connecting form and function.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erik LavingtonDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901 erik.lavington@rutgers.edu.ORCID 0000-0003-1933-9023
Andrew D KernDepartment of Genetics, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08901.ORCID 0000-0003-4381-4680
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey · US

Funding

The Population Genetics of DivergenceR01GM078204 · NIGMS · TEMPLE UNIV OF THE COMMONWEALTH · PI HEY, EMANUEL · 2007 to 2016
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM078204
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chromosomal inversions are a ubiquitous feature of genetic variation. Theoretical models describe several mechanisms by which inversions can drive adaptation and be maintained as polymorphisms. While inversions have been shown previously to be under selection, or contain genetic variation under selection, the specific phenotypic consequences of inversions leading to their maintenance remain unclear. Here we use genomic sequence and expression data from the

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionPolymorphism, GeneticAnimalsDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsQuantitative Trait LociRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsDrosophila Proteinsmod(mdg4) protein, DrosophilaRNA, MessengerTranscription FactorsDGRPDPGPDrosophilaeQTLsinversion polymorphism

Identifiers

PMID28916647
PMCPMC5677173
OpenAlexW2952596465

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.