Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28915891›Full record

SynthesisHealth and quality of life outcomes2017

Inflammatory bowel disease-specific health-related quality of life instruments: a systematic review of measurement properties.

Xin-Lin Chen, Liang-Huan Zhong, Yi Wen, Tian-Wen Liu, Xiao-Ying Li, Zheng-Kun Hou, Yue Hu, Chuan-Wei Mo, Feng-Bin Liu

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 60 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Psychological interventions for treatment of inflammatory bowel disease.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Mapping from SIBDQ to EQ-5D-5L for patients with inflammatory bowel disease.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2024
    Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xin-Lin ChenCollege of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. chenxlsums@126.com.
Liang-Huan ZhongGuangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yi WenThe First Affiliated Hospital, The First Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Tian-Wen LiuGuangdong Province Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Xiao-Ying LiJiangmen Wuyi Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiangmen City, Guangdong Province, China.
Zheng-Kun HouThe First Affiliated Hospital, The First Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Yue HuCollege of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Chuan-Wei MoCollege of Basic Medical Science, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Feng-Bin LiuThe First Affiliated Hospital, The First Clinical College, Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China. liufb163@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis review aims to critically appraise and compare the measurement properties of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-specific health-related quality of life instruments.

methodsMedline, EMBASE and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched from their inception to May 2016. IBD-specific instruments for patients with Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis or IBD were enrolled. The basic characteristics and domains of the instruments were collected. The methodological quality of measurement properties and measurement properties of the instruments were assessed.

resultsFifteen IBD-specific instruments were included, which included twelve instruments for adult IBD patients and three for paediatric IBD patients. All of the instruments were developed in North American and European countries. The following common domains were identified: IBD-related symptoms, physical, emotional and social domain. The methodological quality was satisfactory for content validity; fair in internal consistency, reliability, structural validity, hypotheses testing and criterion validity; and poor in measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness. For adult IBD patients, the IBDQ-32 and its short version (SIBDQ) had good measurement properties and were the most widely used worldwide. For paediatric IBD patients, the IMPACT-III had good measurement properties and had more translated versions.

conclusionsMost methodological quality should be promoted, especially measurement error, cross-cultural validity and responsiveness. The IBDQ-32 was the most widely used instrument with good reliability and validity, followed by the SIBDQ and IMPACT-III. Further validation studies are necessary to support the use of other instruments.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdultFemaleHumansInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMaleReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesValidation Studies as TopicInflammatory bowel diseaseInstrumentMeasurement propertiesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID28915891
PMCPMC5603012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.