Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28915876›Full record

ArticleBMC complementary and alternative medicine2017

Changes in trust and the use of Korean medicine in South Korea: a comparison of surveys in 2011 and 2014.

Soohyun Kwon, Shinhee Heo, Dongjun Kim, Seunghyun Kang, Jong-Min Woo

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC complementary and alternative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Herbal Medicine Prescriptions for Functional Dyspepsia: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Soohyun KwonGuideline Center for Korean Medicine, National Institute of Korean Medicine, Namsan Square 173, Toegye-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul, 04554, South Korea.
Shinhee HeoR&D Strategy and Planning Team, Korea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences, 75 Nowon-Ro, Nowon-Gu, Seoul, 01812, South Korea.
Dongjun KimPolicy Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, 1672 Yuseongdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34054, South Korea.
Seunghyun KangPolicy Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, 1672 Yuseongdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34054, South Korea.
Jong-Min WooPolicy Division, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine, 1672 Yuseongdae-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon, 34054, South Korea. jmwoo@kiom.re.kr.
Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine · KRKorea Institute of Radiological and Medical Sciences · KRNational Development Institute of Korean Medicine · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKorean medicine (KM) has been widely used in Korea. This study aimed to assess the general perceptions of KM, to investigate the patterns of its usage in 2014, and to compare the results with those of an earlier survey from 2011.

methodsA cross-sectional study was conducted with 1000 Korean people. The questionnaire included items regarding trust in KM, reasons for distrust of KM, and visit frequency to KM clinics. This study used methods consistent with those of a 2011 survey to examine changes in attitudes over 3 years.

resultsDespite high rates of trust in KM, the visit frequency decreased from 69.3% in 2011 to 63.2% in 2014. Usage among young adults (in their 20s and 30s) was significantly reduced compared to all other age groups. The KM modality most commonly used by participants was acupuncture, whereas the use of moxibustion and cupping therapies has decreased since 2011. Men and women were most likely to distrust KM due to a "lack of scientific evidence" (59.3%) and "suspicion of KM safety" (47.4%), respectively.

conclusionsThe findings suggested that KM use and trust in KM were slightly lower in 2014 than in 2011. The decreases were most notable among individuals in their 30s and in the use of moxibustion in KM therapy. This study aimed to produce practical insights by reviewing patterns of KM use and perceptions over time. Additional surveys must be considered to produce a more in-depth analysis.

Indexed as

Medicine, Korean TraditionalTrustAcupuncture TherapyAdultAttitude to HealthCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMoxibustionRepublic of KoreaSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultKorean medicinePerceptionPeriodic surveyPrevalenceSouth Korea

Identifiers

PMID28915876
PMCPMC5603087
OpenAlexW2755046143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.