SynthesisBMC medical education2017
Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation.
Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
42 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- What we think about professional and unprofessional behaviors: differences between the perception of clinical faculty members and medical students.BMC medical education · 2022Pooled it
- Professionalism Perceptions: A Comparison of Anesthesiology Trainees and Attendings.Anesthesiology · 2026Article
- Article
- Moral courage efficacy among medical students: associations with environmental professionalism, empathy attitudes, and communication self-efficacy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Dealing with dilemmas in daily clinical practice: The development and evaluation of the seminar "suddenly, at the hospital" aimed at promoting professional identity formation in the final practical year of undergraduate medical education.GMS journal for medical education · 2026Article
- Article
- Transformative Learning as a Theoretical Framework for Professionalism Lapses Among Health Professions Trainees: A Scoping Review.Medical science educator · 2025Article
- Exploring conceptions of medical unprofessionalism in Japan and the UK: a Q-methodology study.Fukushima journal of medical science · 2025Article
- Hallmarks of nursing students exhibiting unsafe clinical practices: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Professionalism lapses in health professions training: Navigating the 'Yellow Card' moments for transformative learning.Medical education · 2025Article
- Transforming Feedback into Learning Throughout the Trajectory of Competency Based Medical Education.Indian pediatrics · 2025Review
- Medical students' unprofessional behavior and educators' support.Korean journal of medical education · 2025Review
- Ethical issues in unprofessional behavior of residents who dispute dismissal: ten year analysis of case law in hospital-based specialties.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- US Medical Schools' 2024 Commencements and Antisemitism: Addressing Unprofessional Behavior.Rambam Maimonides medical journal · 2025Observational
- The experiences of unprofessionalism among students in dental education: a qualitative study.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Perceptions of Medical Students' Unprofessional Behaviors Among Faculty Members and Medical Students: A Cross-Sectional Study at a Japanese Medical School.Advances in medical education and practice · 2025Article
- Characteristics of ADHD in Struggling Residents and Fellows.Journal of graduate medical education · 2024Article
- Professionalism and Ethics in Medical and Dental Education: A Survey of Student Perceptions and Experiences.Cureus · 2024Article
- Creating a Culture of Teaching and Learning.Medical science educator · 2024Article
- Impact of group work on the hidden curriculum that induces students' unprofessional behavior toward faculty.BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDeveloping professionalism is a core task in medical education. Unfortunately, it has remained difficult for educators to identify medical students' unprofessionalism, because, among other reasons, there are no commonly adopted descriptors that can be used to document students' unprofessional behaviour. This study aimed to generate an overview of descriptors for unprofessional behaviour based on research evidence of real-life unprofessional behaviours of medical students.
methodsA systematic review was conducted searching PubMed, Ebsco/ERIC, Ebsco/PsycINFO and Embase.com from inception to 2016. Articles were reviewed for admitted or witnessed unprofessional behaviours of undergraduate medical students.
resultsThe search yielded 11,963 different studies, 46 met all inclusion criteria. We found 205 different descriptions of unprofessional behaviours, which were coded into 30 different descriptors, and subsequently classified in four behavioural themes: failure to engage, dishonest behaviour, disrespectful behaviour, and poor self-awareness.
conclusionsThis overview provides a common language to describe medical students' unprofessional behaviour. The framework of descriptors is proposed as a tool for educators to denominate students' unprofessional behaviours. The found behaviours can have various causes, which should be explored in a discussion with the student about personal, interpersonal and/or institutional circumstances in which the behaviour occurred. Explicitly denominating unprofessional behaviour serves two goals: [i] creating a culture in which unprofessional behaviour is acknowledged, [ii] targeting students who need extra guidance. Both are important to avoid unprofessional behaviour among future doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.