ArticleParasites & vectors2017
How often do mosquitoes bite humans in southern England? A standardised summer trial at four sites reveals spatial, temporal and site-related variation in biting rates.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Updated occurrence and bionomics of potential malaria vectors in Europe: a systematic review (2000-2021).Parasites & vectors · 2022Pooled it
- Evaluating repellence properties of a catnip essential oil-based mosquito repellent using the human landing catch method in Eastern Uganda.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unravelling the activity rhythms of urban vector mosquitoes with smart-trap technology.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Spatial distribution of Culex mosquitoes across England and Wales, July 2023.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Real-time dynamic monitoring and multiplex PCR identification of vector mosquitoes in Zhejiang, China.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2025Article
- Modeling West Nile Virus transmission in birds and humans: Advantages of using a cellular automata approach.Infectious Disease Modelling · 2024Article
- Culex modestus: the overlooked mosquito vector.Parasites & vectors · 2023Review
- First evaluation of antibody responses to Culex quinquefasciatus salivary antigens as a serological biomarker of human exposure to Culex bites: A pilot study in Côte d'Ivoire.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2021Article
- Two New Alternatives to the Conventional Arm-in-Cage Test for Assessing Topical Repellents.Journal of medical entomology · 2021Article
- Establishment ofmSphere · 2021Article
- An Overview of the Management of Mansonellosis.Research and reports in tropical medicine · 2021Review
- Article
- Improved spatial ecological sampling using open data and standardization: an example from malaria mosquito surveillance.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019Article
- Article
- Bird-biting mosquitoes on farms in southern England.The Veterinary record · 2018Article
- Assessment of the Public Health Threats Posed by Vector-Borne Disease in the United Kingdom (UK).International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Article
- Evaluation of standard field and laboratory methods to compare protection times of the topical repellents PMD and DEET.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- The Role of Culex pipiens L. (Diptera: Culicidae) in Virus Transmission in Europe.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThis field-based study examined the abundance and species complement of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) attracted to humans at four sites in the United Kingdom (UK). The study used a systematic approach to directly measure feeding by mosquitoes on humans at multiple sites and using multiple volunteers. Quantifying how frequently humans are bitten in the field by mosquitoes is a fundamental parameter in assessing arthropod-borne virus transmission.
methodsHuman landing catches were conducted using a standardised protocol by multiple volunteers at four rural sites between July and August 2013. Collections commenced two hours prior to sunset and lasted for a total of four hours. To reduce bias occurring due to collection point or to the individual attractiveness of the volunteer to mosquitoes, each collection was divided into eight collection periods, with volunteers rotated by randomised Latin square design between four sampling points per site. While the aim was to collect mosquitoes prior to feeding, the source of blood meals from any engorged specimens was also identified by DNA barcoding.
resultsThree of the four sites yielded human-biting mosquito populations for a total of 915 mosquitoes of fifteen species/species groups. Mosquito species composition and biting rates differed significantly between sites, with individual volunteers collecting between 0 and 89 mosquitoes (over 200 per hour) of up to six species per collection period. Coquillettidia richiardii (Ficalbi, 1889) was responsible for the highest recorded biting rates at any one site, reaching 161 bites per hour, whilst maximum biting rates of 55 bites per hour were recorded for Culex modestus (Ficalbi, 1889). Human-biting by Culex pipiens (L., 1758) form pipiens was also observed at two sites, but at much lower rates when compared to other species.
conclusionsSeveral mosquito species are responsible for human nuisance biting pressure in southern England, although human exposure to biting may be largely limited to evening outdoor activities. This study indicates Cx. modestus can be a major human-biting species in the UK whilst Cx. pipiens f. pipiens may show greater opportunistic human-biting than indicated by earlier studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.