Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28915689›Full record

ArticleOncotarget2017

Different long-term oncologic outcomes after radical surgical resection for neuroendocrine carcinoma and adenocarcinoma of the stomach.

Jian-Wei Xie, Jun Lu, Jian-Xian Lin, Chao-Hui Zheng, Ping Li, Jia-Bin Wang, Qi-Yue Chen, Long-Long Cao, Mi Lin, Ru-Hong Tu and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jian-Wei XieDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jun LuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jian-Xian LinDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Chao-Hui ZhengDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Ping LiDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Bin WangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Qi-Yue ChenDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Long-Long CaoDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Mi LinDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Ru-Hong TuDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Chang-Ming HuangDepartment of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, People's Republic of China.
Union Hospital · CNFujian Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo explore differences in long-term outcomes between gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC).

methodsOne hundred GNEC patients and 3089 GAC patients were enrolled. Differences in long-term outcomes between the groups were analyzed by 1:2 propensity score matching.

resultsStatistically significant differences between the groups were noted in terms of gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor size, T stage, N stage, TNM stage and surgical approach. However, differences were not significant after matching. The 3-year and 5-year overall survival rates for the GNEC group were reduced compared with those for the GAC group, though disease-free survival rates and mean recurrence times were similar. Notably, the mean post-recurrence survival of the GNEC group was significantly worse than that of the GAC group (5.2

conclusionsThe long-term oncologic outcome of GNEC was worse than that of GAC, which may be relative to its reduced post-recurrence survival. A high Ki-67 labeling index was an independent factor influencing patient post-recurrence survival.

Indexed as

gastric neoplasmneuroendocrine neoplasmprognosispropensity score matching study

Identifiers

PMID28915689
PMCPMC5593661
OpenAlexW2590541964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.