ArticleOncotarget2017
Association of
Article in Oncotarget, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Lack of Association between TP73 G4C14-A4T14 Polymorphism and Cervical Cancer Risk in Overall and Asian Women: A Meta-Analysis.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Pooled it
- Association betweenThe Journal of international medical research · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Higher serum zinc levels may reduce the risk of cervical cancer in Asian women: A meta-analysis.The Journal of international medical research · 2018Pooled it
- Elemental Composition of Women's Fingernails: A Comparative Analysis Between Cervical Cancer Patients and Healthy Individuals.Biological trace element research · 2025Article
- Splicing Genomics Events in Cervical Cancer: Insights for Phenotypic Stratification and Biomarker Potency.Genes · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThe relation between
resultsThe present study included 635 patients with cervical cancer and 998 cancer-free control subjects. Using meta-analysis, we found a significant association of P73 genetic polymorphism with cervical cancer in a recessive model [OR = 0.91, 95% CI: 0.84-0.98; MATERIALS AND
methodsTo further evaluate the relation between the
conclusionsOur results suggest that
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.