Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28915478›Full record

ArticleDrug and alcohol dependence2017

Studying the interactive effects of menthol and nicotine among youth: An examination using e-cigarettes.

Suchitra Krishnan-Sarin, Barry G Green, Grace Kong, Dana A Cavallo, Peter Jatlow, Ralitza Gueorguieva, Eugenia Buta, Stephanie S O'Malley

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug and alcohol dependence, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 51 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Effects of Nicotine Content and Preferred Flavor on Subjective Responses to E-cigarettes: A Randomized, Placebo-controlled Laboratory Study.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2024
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Suchitra Krishnan-SarinDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, United States. Electronic address: suchitra.krishnan-sarin@yale.edu.
Barry G GreenThe John B. Pierce Laboratory and Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.
Grace KongDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.
Dana A CavalloDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.
Peter JatlowDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.
Ralitza GueorguievaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, United States.
Eugenia ButaDepartment of Biostatistics, Yale University School of Public Health, United States.
Stephanie S O'MalleyDepartment of Psychiatry, Yale University School of Medicine, United States.
Yale University · USJohn B. Pierce Laboratory · US

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Yale Tobacco Center of Regulatory ScienceP50DA036151 · NIDA · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KRISHNAN-SARIN, SUCHITRA, O'MALLEY, STEPHANIE S · 2013 to 2017
$20.6M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA036151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTobacco products containing menthol are widely used by youth. We used e-cigarettes to conduct an experimental evaluation of the independent and interactive effects of menthol and nicotine among youth. PROCEDURES: Pilot chemosensory experiments with fourteen e-cigarette users identified low (barely perceptible, 0.5%) and high (similar to commercial e-liquid, 3.5%) menthol concentrations. Sixty e-cigarette users were randomized to a nicotine concentration (0mg/ml, 6mg/ml, 12mg/ml) and participated in 3 laboratory sessions. During each session, they received their assigned nicotine concentration, along with one of three menthol concentrations in random counterbalanced order across sessions (0, 0.5%, 3.5%), and participated in three fixed-dose, and an ad-lib, puffing period. Urinary menthol glucuronide and salivary nicotine levels validated menthol and nicotine exposure. We examined changes in e-cigarette liking/wanting and taste, coolness, stimulant effects, nicotine withdrawal and ad-lib use.

resultsOverall, the high concentration of menthol (3.5%) significantly increased e-cigarette liking/wanting relative to no menthol (p<0.001); there was marginal evidence of nicotine* menthol interactions (p=0.06), with an increase in liking/wanting when 3.5% menthol was combined with 12mg/ml nicotine, but not 6mg/ml nicotine. Importantly, both 0.5% and 3.5% menthol concentrations significantly improved taste and increased coolness. We did not observe nicotine or menthol-related changes in stimulant effects, nicotine withdrawal symptoms or ad-lib use.

conclusionsMenthol, even at very low doses, alters the appeal of e-cigarettes among youth. Further, menthol enhances positive rewarding effects of high nicotine-containing e-cigarettes among youth.

Indexed as

Electronic Nicotine Delivery SystemsAdolescentGlucuronatesHumansMentholNicotineSubstance Withdrawal SyndromeTasteTobacco ProductsGlucuronatesMentholmenthol glucuronideNicotineElectronic cigarettesMentholNicotineYouth

Identifiers

PMID28915478
PMCPMC5659733
OpenAlexW2751565371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.