Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28914809›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2017

Perception of Radiation Risk as a Predictor of Mid-Term Mental Health after a Nuclear Disaster: The Fukushima Health Management Survey.

Itaru Miura, Masato Nagai, Masaharu Maeda, Mayumi Harigane, Senta Fujii, Misari Oe, Hirooki Yabe, Yuriko Suzuki, Hideto Takahashi, Tetsuya Ohira and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Public Health Preparedness for and Response to Nuclear Disasters: An Editorial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Itaru MiuraDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. itaru@fmu.ac.jp.
Masato NagaiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. mnagai@fmu.ac.jp.
Masaharu MaedaRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. masagen@fmu.ac.jp.
Mayumi HariganeRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. harigane@fmu.ac.jp.
Senta FujiiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. fuji-sen@fmu.ac.jp.
Misari OeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Kurume University, Fukuoka 830-0011, Japan. oe_misari@kurume-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-4550-036X
Hirooki YabeDepartment of Neuropsychiatry, School of Medicine, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. hyabe@fmu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0003-2668-129X
Yuriko SuzukiDepartment of Adult Mental Health, National Institute of Mental Health, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, Tokyo 187-8553, Japan. yrsuzuki@ncnp.go.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3551-6512
Hideto TakahashiRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. htaka@fmu.ac.jp.
Tetsuya OhiraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. fwge1119@mb.infoweb.ne.jp.
Seiji YasumuraRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. yasumura@fmu.ac.jp.
Masafumi AbeRadiation Medical Science Center for the Fukushima Health Management Survey, Fukushima 960-1295, Japan. masafumi@fmu.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predictive factors including risk perception for mid-term mental health after a nuclear disaster remain unknown. The purpose of this study was to examine the association between perceived radiation risk and other factors at baseline and mid-term mental health after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster of 2011 in Japan. A mail-based questionnaire survey was conducted in January 2012 and January 2013. Mental health status was assessed using the K6 scale. Psychological distress over the 2-year period was categorized into the following four groups: chronic, recovered, resistant, or worsened. Most participants (80.3%) were resistant to the disaster. A positive association was found between the radiation risk perception regarding immediate effects and the worsened group in women. Baseline post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) or a history of psychiatric disease predicted being in the chronic or worsened group in mid-term course. These results suggest that evacuees who believed that their health was substantially affected by the nuclear disaster were at an increased risk of having poor mid-term mental health in women. Careful assessment of risk perception after a nuclear disaster, including the presence of PTSD or a history of psychiatric disease, is needed for appropriate interventions.

Indexed as

DisastersFukushima Nuclear AccidentPerceptionRadiation ExposureAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHealth SurveysHumansJapanMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMiddle AgedRiskevacuationmid-term mental healthnuclear disasterpredictive factorrisk perception

Identifiers

PMID28914809
PMCPMC5615604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.