Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28914429›Full record

SynthesisThe patient2018

A Systematic Review of Patient and Caregiver Experiences with a Tracheostomy.

Ivana Nakarada-Kordic, Niamh Patterson, Jill Wrapson, Stephen D Reay

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The patient, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07481435 (TRacheostomy in DElphi for iNTensive Care'), which is not on this map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07481435 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

TRacheostomy in DElphi for iNTensive Care' (TRiDENT)

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversita degli Studi di GenovaRan2026 to 2026Enrolled40ConditionsDelphi Process, Delphi StudyArmsDelphi Consensus Process
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 131 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Predictors of Decannulation Success in Tracheostomy: A 10-Year Analysis of the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative Database.Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Effect of AvTrachTracheostomy (Warrenville, Ill.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Plea for routine endoscopic tracheostomy tube adjustment.Frontiers in rehabilitation sciences · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ivana Nakarada-KordicDesign for Health and Wellbeing (DHW) Lab, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland University of Technology, Level 5, Building 32, Park Rd., Auckland, 1023, New Zealand. ivana@dhwlab.com.ORCID 0000-0003-2906-7623
Niamh PattersonDesign for Health and Wellbeing (DHW) Lab, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland University of Technology, Level 5, Building 32, Park Rd., Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Jill WrapsonDesign for Health and Wellbeing (DHW) Lab, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland University of Technology, Level 5, Building 32, Park Rd., Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Stephen D ReayDesign for Health and Wellbeing (DHW) Lab, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland University of Technology, Level 5, Building 32, Park Rd., Auckland, 1023, New Zealand.
Auckland City Hospital · NZ

Funding

Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand Strategic Research Investment Fund award 2016
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA tracheostomy is a surgically created opening through the anterior neck tissues and the trachea, into which a tube is inserted. Despite its influence on basic human needs such as respiration, communication and nutrition, little is known about the impact of tracheostomy on patients and their caregivers or what could be done to enable better care and quality of life (QoL) for these individuals.

objectiveThe aim of this review was to better understand the current knowledge related to the experience and QoL of adults living with a tracheostomy and their caregivers so as to be able to improve these experiences.

methodA systematic review of the English-language, peer-reviewed literature was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, PsychINFO, Google Scholar, and CINAHL databases. Articles were eligible if they included adult patient or lay caregiver-reported experiences of tracheostomy.

resultsOverall, 1080 articles were identified and 17 eligible for inclusion. Fourteen articles reported on experiences of tracheostomy patients, while three focused on those of their caregivers. Studies were conducted in the home setting (n = 5), on a hospital ward (n = 4), in an intensive care unit (n = 3), in an outpatient clinic (n = 3), in a rehab facility (n = 1), and online (n = 1). Patients and their caregivers reported a range of mostly negative experiences related to the care, support, and management of a tracheostomy, speech and communication, wellbeing and QoL, disfigurement and body image, and stigma and social withdrawal.

conclusionFew studies have published data on the patient and caregiver experiences with tracheostomy, especially in the community setting. There is a need to better understand these experiences in order to be able to formulate strategies and provide resources to improve the quality of care and overall QoL of patients with a tracheostomy and their caregivers in-hospital and in the community.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdaptation, PsychologicalCaregiversCommunicationHome Care ServicesHospitalizationHumansPatientsQualitative ResearchSelf EfficacyStress, PsychologicalTracheostomy

Identifiers

PMID28914429
OpenAlexW2754573180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.