Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28914404›Full record

ArticleJournal of materials science. Materials in medicine2017

Development and characterization of hybrid tubular structure of PLCL porous scaffold with hMSCs/ECs cell sheet.

Azizah Intan Pangesty, Takaaki Arahira, Mitsugu Todo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Azizah Intan PangestyDepartment of Molecular and Material Science, Interdisciplinary Graduate School of Engineering Science, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan.
Takaaki ArahiraFukuoka Dental Collage, Sawara-ku, Fukuoka, 814-0193, Japan.
Mitsugu TodoResearch Institute for Applied Mechanics, Kyushu University, Kasuga, Fukuoka, 816-8580, Japan. todo@riam.kyushu-u.ac.jp.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tissue engineering offers an alternate approach to providing vascular graft with potential to grow similar with native tissue by seeding autologous cells into biodegradable scaffold. In this study, we developed a combining technique by layering a sheet of cells onto a porous tubular scaffold. The cell sheet prepared from co-culturing human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) and endothelial cells (ECs) were able to infiltrate through porous structure of the tubular poly (lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLCL) scaffold and further proliferated on luminal wall within a week of culture. Moreover, the co-culture cell sheet within the tubular scaffold has demonstrated a faster proliferation rate than the monoculture cell sheet composed of MSCs only. We also found that the co-culture cell sheet expressed a strong angiogenic marker, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor (VEGFR), as compared with the monoculture cell sheet within 2 weeks of culture, indicating that the co-culture system could induce differentiation into endothelial cell lineage. This combined technique would provide cellularization and maturation of vascular construct in relatively short period with a strong expression of angiogenic properties.

Indexed as

BioprosthesisBlood Vessel ProsthesisCell AdhesionCell DifferentiationCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCell ShapeCoculture TechniquesEndothelial CellsHumansMaterials TestingMesenchymal Stem CellsPolyestersPorosityTissue EngineeringTissue Scaffoldslactide-caprolactone copolymerPolyesters

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.