Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28914184›Full record

ArticleGlobal health action2017

Elements of effective community engagement: lessons from a targeted malaria elimination study in Lao PDR (Laos).

Bipin Adhikari, Christopher Pell, Koukeo Phommasone, Xayaphone Soundala, Palingnaphone Kommarasy, Tiengkham Pongvongsa, Gisela Henriques, Nicholas P J Day, Mayfong Mayxay, Phaik Yeong Cheah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global health action, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 91 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
91citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

91 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

31 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Bipin Adhikaria Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine , Mahidol University , Bangkok , Thailand.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8981-3910
Christopher Pelld Centre for Social Science and Global Health , University of Amsterdam , Amsterdam , The Netherlands.
Koukeo Phommasonef Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU) , Microbiology Laboratory , Vientiane , Laos.
Xayaphone Soundalaf Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU) , Microbiology Laboratory , Vientiane , Laos.
Palingnaphone Kommarasyf Lao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit (LOMWRU) , Microbiology Laboratory , Vientiane , Laos.
Tiengkham Pongvongsag Savannakhet Provincial Health Department , Savannakhet Province , Laos.
Gisela Henriquesa Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine , Mahidol University , Bangkok , Thailand.
Nicholas P J Daya Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine , Mahidol University , Bangkok , Thailand.
Mayfong Mayxayb Centre for Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nuffield Department of Medicine , Churchill Hospital , Oxford , UK.
Phaik Yeong Cheaha Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Medicine Research Unit, Faculty of Tropical Medicine , Mahidol University , Bangkok , Thailand.
Mahidol University · THLao-Oxford-Mahosot Hospital-Wellcome Trust Research Unit · LAAmsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development · NLChurchill Hospital · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMass drug (antimalarial) administration (MDA) is currently under study in Southeast Asia as part of a package of interventions referred to as targeted malaria elimination (TME). This intervention relies on effective community engagement that promotes uptake and adherence in target communities (above 80%).

objectiveBased on the experienced of designing and implementing the community engagement for TME in Laos, in this article we aim to present the elements of effective community engagement for mass antimalarial administration.

methodsThe design and implementation of community engagement, which took place from September 2015 to August 2016 was recorded as field notes, meeting minutes and photographs. These data underwent qualitative content analysis.

resultsThe community engagement strategy that accompanied TME in Laos was successful in terms of contributing to high levels of participation in mass anti-malarial administration (above 85%). Based on the experience of designing and implementing the community engagement, five key elements were identified: (1) stakeholder and authority engagement, which proceeded from national level, to regional/district and local level; (2) local human resources, particularly the recruitment of local volunteers who were integral to the design and implementation of activities in the study villages; (3) formative research, to rapidly gain insight into the local social and economic context; (4) responsiveness whereby the approach was adapted according to the needs of the community and their responses to the various study components; and (5) sharing control/leadership with the community in terms of decisions on the organization of TME activities.

conclusionsThe community engagement that accompanied TME in Laos had to deal with challenges of implementing a complex study in remote and linguistically isolated villages. Despite these challenges, the study recorded high population coverage. Lessons learnt from this experience are useful for studies and intervention programs in diverse contexts.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationAntimalarialsEnvironmentHumansLaosLeadershipMalariaVolunteersAntimalarialsCommunitycommunity engagementeliminationLaosmalariamass drug administrations

Identifiers

PMID28914184
PMCPMC5645700
OpenAlexW2755806578

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.