Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913966›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2017

Good practices for real-world data studies of treatment and/or comparative effectiveness: Recommendations from the joint ISPOR-ISPE Special Task Force on real-world evidence in health care decision making.

Marc L Berger, Harold Sox, Richard J Willke, Diana L Brixner, Hans-Georg Eichler, Wim Goettsch, David Madigan, Amr Makady, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Rosanna Tarricone and 3 more

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 177 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
177citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04002323 completednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Real Life Study of Dolutegravir Plus Lamivudine in HIV-1-Infected Treatment-Naive Patients

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorUniversity Hospital Virgen de las NievesRan2019 to 2022Enrolled88ConditionsHIV-1-infectionArmsDolutegravir 50mg Tab, Lamivudine 300 mg
NCT04212390 completednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Personalized Medicine Program on Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Characterization of the Patient's Genome for Clinical Decision Making and Systematic Collection of Real World Data to Improve Quality of Health Care

TypeobservationalSponsorFondazione Italiana Sindromi Mielodisplastiche-ETSRan2020 to 2024Enrolled1,000ConditionsMDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

177 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Economic Evaluations Informed Exclusively by Real World Data: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Treatment patterns in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who received darolutamide in the ARAMIS trial in Spain: PARASEC study.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026
    Observational
  20. Article

117 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marc L BergerNew York City, NY, USA.
Harold SoxPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Richard J WillkeInternational Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Diana L BrixnerUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Hans-Georg EichlerEuropean Medicines Agency, London, UK.
Wim GoettschZorginstituut Nederland and University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
David MadiganColumbia University, New York City, NY, USA.
Amr MakadyZorginstituut Nederland and University of Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sebastian SchneeweissBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Rosanna TarriconeBocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Shirley V WangBrigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
John WatkinsPremera Blue Cross, Mountlake Terrace, WA, USA.
C Daniel MullinsUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeReal-world evidence (RWE) includes data from retrospective or prospective observational studies and observational registries and provides insights beyond those addressed by randomized controlled trials. RWE studies aim to improve health care decision making.

methodsThe International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) and the International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE) created a task force to make recommendations regarding good procedural practices that would enhance decision makers' confidence in evidence derived from RWD studies. Peer review by ISPOR/ISPE members and task force participants provided a consensus-building iterative process for the topics and framing of recommendations.

resultsThe ISPOR/ISPE Task Force recommendations cover seven topics such as study registration, replicability, and stakeholder involvement in RWE studies. These recommendations, in concert with earlier recommendations about study methodology, provide a trustworthy foundation for the expanded use of RWE in health care decision making.

conclusionThe focus of these recommendations is good procedural practices for studies that test a specific hypothesis in a specific population. We recognize that some of the recommendations in this report may not be widely adopted without appropriate incentives from decision makers, journal editors, and other key stakeholders.

Indexed as

Decision MakingAdvisory CommitteesDelivery of Health CareEconomics, PharmaceuticalHumansInternationalityPharmacoepidemiologyPragmatic Clinical Trials as TopicProspective StudiesRetrospective StudiesSocieties, ScientificStatistics as TopicTreatment Outcomecomparative effectivenessdecision makingguidelinespharmacoepidemiologyreal-world datatreatment effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID28913966
PMCPMC5639372

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.