Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913923›Full record

ArticleStem cells (Dayton, Ohio)2017

An Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Patient Specific Model of Complement Factor H (Y402H) Polymorphism Displays Characteristic Features of Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Indicates a Beneficial Role for UV Light Exposure.

Dean Hallam, Joseph Collin, Sanja Bojic, Valeria Chichagova, Adriana Buskin, Yaobo Xu, Lucia Lafage, Elsje G Otten, George Anyfantis, Carla Mellough and 10 more

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cells (Dayton, Ohio), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Dean HallamInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Joseph CollinInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Sanja BojicInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Valeria ChichagovaInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Adriana BuskinInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Yaobo XuInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Lucia LafageInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Elsje G OttenCampus for Ageing and Vitality, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences and Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
George AnyfantisInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Carla MelloughInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Stefan PrzyborskiDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, United Kingdom.
Sameer AlharthiPrincess Al Jawhara Al-Brahim Centre of Excellence in Research of Hereditary Disorders, King Abdulaziz University, Saudi Arabia.
Viktor KorolchukCampus for Ageing and Vitality, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences and Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Andrew LoteryClinical and Experimental Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Gabriele SaretzkiCampus for Ageing and Vitality, Institute for Cell and Molecular Biosciences and Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Martin McKibbinLeeds Teaching Hospital NHS, Leeds, United Kingdom.
Lyle ArmstrongInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
David SteelInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
David KavanaghInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.
Majlinda LakoInstitute of Genetic Medicine, International Centre for Life, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-1327-8573
Centre for Life · GBNewcastle Hospitals - Campus for Ageing and Vitality · GBDurham University · GBKing Abdulaziz University · SALeeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/E012841/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/I020209/1European Research Council 614620Medical Research Council G0301182National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research NC/C016106/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) is the most common cause of blindness, accounting for 8.7% of all blindness globally. Vision loss is caused ultimately by apoptosis of the retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) and overlying photoreceptors. Treatments are evolving for the wet form of the disease; however, these do not exist for the dry form. Complement factor H polymorphism in exon 9 (Y402H) has shown a strong association with susceptibility to AMD resulting in complement activation, recruitment of phagocytes, RPE damage, and visual decline. We have derived and characterized induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from two subjects without AMD and low-risk genotype and two patients with advanced AMD and high-risk genotype and generated RPE cells that show local secretion of several proteins involved in the complement pathway including factor H, factor I, and factor H-like protein 1. The iPSC RPE cells derived from high-risk patients mimic several key features of AMD including increased inflammation and cellular stress, accumulation of lipid droplets, impaired autophagy, and deposition of "drüsen"-like deposits. The low- and high-risk RPE cells respond differently to intermittent exposure to UV light, which leads to an improvement in cellular and functional phenotype only in the high-risk AMD-RPE cells. Taken together, our data indicate that the patient specific iPSC model provides a robust platform for understanding the role of complement activation in AMD, evaluating new therapies based on complement modulation and drug testing. Stem Cells 2017;35:2305-2320.

Indexed as

Ultraviolet RaysAgedAnimalsComplement Factor HHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsMacular DegenerationMiceMice, SCIDUltraviolet TherapyCFH protein, humanComplement Factor HAge-related macular degenerationComplement factor HInduced pluripotent stem cellRetinal pigment epithelium

Identifiers

PMID28913923
PMCPMC5698780
OpenAlexW2784771549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.