ArticleSurgical endoscopy2018
Minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a collar access: experience in 246 cases with the CEViTS technique.
Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring Parameters and Risk of Recurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injury in Thyroidectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Patterns of lymph node metastasis in level IIB and contralateral level VI for papillary thyroid carcinoma with pN1b and safety of low collar extended incision for neck dissection in level II.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Comparison of Supraclavicular Oblique Incision With Traditional Low Collar Incision Approach for Thyroidectomy in Differentiated Thyroid Cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Hybrid techniques and patients' safety in implementing transoral sublingual thyroidectomy.Endocrine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe arguments for applying minimally invasive techniques are, besides cosmetic results, reduced access trauma and less postoperative pain. In thyroid surgery, cosmetic aspects are gaining importance. Whether minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery is less painful has not been shown yet.
methodIn this study, we analyse the outcome of 246 patients who underwent cervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) regarding the surgery itself, their postoperative pain and satisfaction with the procedure.
resultsCEViTS is routinely performed in our hospital. In this study, no postoperative bleedings that would have made a reoperation necessary occurred. All lobectomies could be completed endoscopically. In two cases, conversions (enlargement of the 5-mm incision to 25 mm) were necessary. Transient nerve palsy was registered in three patients (1.22%). One patient (0.41%) had a permanent palsy of the recurrent laryngeal nerve. In comparison to open surgery (n = 173 patients), the 246 CEViTS patients had a significantly lower pain level (p = 0.047).
conclusionsCervical endoscopic video-assisted thyroid surgery (CEViTS) can be considered a safe, less traumatizing and useful minimally invasive procedure in endoscopic thyroid surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
28913737What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.