ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2017
High transient colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii between mothers and newborn.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Review
- Global prevalence of infections in newborns with respiratory complications: systematic review and meta-analysis.Iranian journal of microbiology · 2024Article
- Trends in the Epidemiology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- Pneumocystis jirovecii Colonization in Preterm Newborns With Respiratory Distress Syndrome.The Journal of infectious diseases · 2022Article
- Sero-Epidemiology ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Is It Possible to DifferentiateJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Transmission and Colonization ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Pneumocystis jirovecii among patients with cystic fibrosis and their household members.Medical mycology · 2021Observational
- Pneumocystis jirovecii colonization and its association with pulmonary diseases: a multicenter study based on a modified loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Article
- Acquired Immunodeficiency from Maternal Chemotherapy and Severe PrimaryCase reports in pediatrics · 2020Article
- A Molecular Window into the Biology and Epidemiology of Pneumocystis spp.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2018Review
- Colonization by Pneumocystis jirovecii in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: association with exacerbations and lung function status.The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious DiseasesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to explore the frequency and dynamics of acquisition and colonization of Pneumocystis jirovecii among neonates, as well as the epidemiological and genotypic characteristics in mother-child binomial. In a prospective enrolled cohort of women in their third trimester of pregnancy, nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) and clinical and epidemiological data were collected at four different times: 17 days, 2nd, 4th, and 6th month of life of the newborn. P. jirovecii was detected by nested-PCR for the mtLSU-rRNA gene in each NPS; the genotypes were determined amplifying four genes. Forty-three pairs and 301 NPS were included. During the third trimester, 16.3% of pregnant women were colonized. The rate of colonization in mothers at delivery was 16, 6, 16, and 5% and in their children 28, 43, 42, and 25%, respectively. Within pregnant women, 53% remained negative throughout follow-up, and among these, 91% of their children were positive in at least one of their samples. In both, mothers and children, the most frequent genotype of P. jirovecii was 1.
conclusionThe frequency of colonization by P. jirovecii was higher in newborns than in their respective progenitors. Colonization of both mothers and children is transitory; however, the mother of the newborn is not necessarily the source of primary infection. What is Known: • We did not find studies comparing P. jirovecii colonization between mothers and children simultaneously, yet the frequency of colonization by serologic and molecular methods in pregnant women has been reported. What is New: • According to our findings, 3/4 of the children had transient colonization during the first 6 months of life, in only half in the mothers, without proof of mother-to-child transmission or vice versa.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.