Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913677›Full record

ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017

Thus Far and No Further: Should Diastolic Hypotension Limit Intensive Blood Pressure Lowering?

Marcel Ruzicka, Cedric Edwards, Brendan McCormick, Swapnil Hiremath

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcel RuzickaDivision of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Cedric EdwardsDivision of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Brendan McCormickDivision of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Swapnil HiremathDivision of Nephrology, The Ottawa Hospital and University of Ottawa, 1967 Riverside Drive, Ottawa, ON, Canada. shiremath@toh.ca.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

opinion statementIntensive blood pressure lowering to systolic blood pressure thresholds of less than 120 mmHg is making a slow comeback with the publication of trials supporting its benefit, especially in lowering stroke and congestive heart failure. At the same time, there is an increasing awareness of the prevalence and risk of diastolic hypotension, especially at levels of less than 60 mmHg, with support for the existence of a J-curve coming from post hoc analyses of trials and epidemiological data from large cohort studies. Hence, intensive lowering of systolic blood pressure should be done cautiously in those patients who have pre-existing coronary artery disease, and a diastolic blood pressure between 60 and 70 mmHg. Among those with diastolic blood pressure already below 60 mmHg, but whose systolic blood pressure is not at target, we recommend shared decision-making with an explicit discussion of the risks and benefits, and taking patient preferences into account. Further research with biomarkers and risk models exploring heterogeneity of outcomes might allow for more precise targeting of intensive blood pressure lowering in individuals most likely to benefit, with avoiding those most likely to harm.

Indexed as

Cardiovascular diseaseClinical epidemiologyDiastolic blood pressureHypertensionHypotensionJ-curve

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.