Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913645›Full record

SynthesisEuropean archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry2017

Local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: a systematic review of techniques and pharmacologic agents.

G Klingberg, K Ridell, S Brogårdh-Roth, M Vall, H Berlin

Open access · hybridAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical and radiographic outcomes of laser pulpotomy in vital primary teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2018
    Pooled it
  2. Best clinical practice guidance for local analgesia in paediatric dentistry: an EAPD policy document.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2017
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. The effect of needle demonstration during local anaesthesia on the child's dental fear, pain perception and behaviour: a randomised controlled trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Trial
  5. Comparative study of articaine 4% versus lidocaine 2% in the local anesthesia of permanent mandibular first molars affected by MIH: a randomized controlled trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2023
    Trial
  6. Comparison of two behavior management techniques used during mandibular block anesthesia among preschool children: a randomized clinical trial.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2021
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Comparison of different techniques used for inferior alveolar nerve block anaesthesia regarding the pain caused in cooperative children.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2025
    Article
  11. Swiss paediatric dentists' preferences and experience on the use of articaine and other local/topical anaesthetics.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Post-operative discomforts in children after extraction of primary teeth.Clinical and experimental dental research · 2020
    Observational
  16. Postoperative pain profile in 10-15-year-olds after bilateral extraction of maxillary premolars.European archives of paediatric dentistry : official journal of the European Academy of Paediatric Dentistry · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

G KlingbergDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, SE 205 06, Malmö, Sweden. gunilla.klingberg@mah.se.
K RidellDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, SE 205 06, Malmö, Sweden.
S Brogårdh-RothDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, SE 205 06, Malmö, Sweden.
M VallLibrary Services, Malmö University, Malmö, Sweden.
H BerlinDepartment of Pediatric Dentistry, Faculty of Odontology, Malmö University, SE 205 06, Malmö, Sweden.
Malmö University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo evaluate the evidence supporting effects and adverse effects of local analgesia using different pharmacological agents and injection techniques during dental treatment in children and adolescents aged 3-19 years.

methodsA systematic literature search of databases including PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus was conducted in November 2016. The PRISMA-statement was followed. Two review authors independently assessed the selected randomised control trials for risk of bias and quality.

results725 scientific papers were identified. 89 papers were identified to be read in full text of which 80 were excluded. Finally, 9 papers were evaluated for quality and risk of bias. Many of the included papers had methodological shortcomings affecting the possibility to draw conclusions. Information about ethical clearance and consent were missing in some of the included papers. No alarming adverse effects were identified. One study was assessed as having low risk of bias. This reported inferior alveolar nerve block to be more effective than buccal infiltration for dental treatment of mandibular molars, while no differences were found regarding pharmacological agents.

conclusionsAt present, there is insufficient evidence in support of any pharmacologic agent or injection technique as being superior compared to others. There is a need for more rigorous studies which also handle the ethical issues of including children in potentially painful studies.

Indexed as

Dental Care for ChildrenAdolescentAnesthesia, LocalAnesthetics, LocalChildChild, PreschoolEthics, DentalHumansPain ManagementAnesthetics, LocalAdolescentChildDentalLocal anaesthesiaLocal analgesiaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID28913645
PMCPMC5651714
OpenAlexW2755119593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.