Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913642›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Small-Volume, Fast-Emptying Gastric Pouch Leads to Better Long-Term Weight Loss and Food Tolerance After Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass.

Daniel Riccioppo, Marco Aurelio Santo, Manoel Rocha, Carlos Alberto Buchpiguel, Marcio Augusto Diniz, Denis Pajecki, Roberto de Cleva, Flavio Kawamoto

Open access · greenAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Factors Associated with Weight Loss After Endoscopic Transoral Outlet Reduction (TORe).Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daniel RiccioppoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Oscar Freire 2250 - CJ 314, São Paulo, SP, 05409-011, Brazil. danriccioppo@me.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3289-8639
Marco Aurelio SantoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Oscar Freire 2250 - CJ 314, São Paulo, SP, 05409-011, Brazil.
Manoel RochaInstitute of Radiology, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Alberto BuchpiguelNuclear Medicine Center, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil.
Marcio Augusto DinizBiostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, USA.
Denis PajeckiDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Oscar Freire 2250 - CJ 314, São Paulo, SP, 05409-011, Brazil.
Roberto de ClevaDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Oscar Freire 2250 - CJ 314, São Paulo, SP, 05409-011, Brazil.
Flavio KawamotoDepartment of Digestive Surgery, Hospital das Clínicas, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, Rua Oscar Freire 2250 - CJ 314, São Paulo, SP, 05409-011, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRCedars-Sinai Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAnatomical and functional influences on gastric bypass (GBP) results are often poorly evaluated and not yet fully understood. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the gastric pouch volume and its emptying rate on long-term weight loss and food tolerance after GBP. MATERIALS AND

methodsWeight loss, food tolerance, pouch volumetry (V) by three-dimensional reconstruction, and pouch emptying rate by 4 h scintigraphy were evaluated in 67 patients. Cutoffs were identified for V and retention percentage (%Ret) at 1 h (%Ret1). From these parameters, the sample was categorized, looking for associations between V, %Ret, weight loss, and food tolerance, assessed by a questionnaire for quick assessment of food tolerance (SS).

resultsPO median follow-up time was 47 months; median V was 28 mL; %Ret at 1, 2, and 4 h were 8, 2, and 1%, respectively. There were associations between V ≤ 40 mL and higher emptying rates up to 2 h (V ≤ 40 mL: %Ret1 = 6, %Ret2 = 2, p = 0.009; V > 40 mL: %Ret1 = 44, %Ret2 = 13.5, p = 0.045). An association was found between higher emptying speed in 1 h and higher late weight loss (WL), represented by lower percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) regain (p = 0.036) and higher %EWL (p = 0.033) in the group with %Ret1 ≤ 12%, compared to the group %Ret1 ≥ 25%. Better food tolerance (SS > 24), was associated with lower %Ret1 (p = 0.003).

conclusionSmaller pouch size is associated with a faster gastric emptying, greater WL maintenance, and better food tolerance. These data suggest that a small pouch with rapid emptying rate is an important technical parameter for good outcomes in GBP.

Indexed as

Weight LossAdultBody Mass IndexDietFemaleGastric BypassGastric EmptyingHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesity, MorbidOrgan SizePortion SizeStomachSurveys and QuestionnairesBariatric surgeryGastric bypassGastric emptyingGastric volumetryThree-dimensionalWeight loss

Identifiers

PMID28913642
OpenAlexW2754234424

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.