ArticleNeurocritical care2017
Emergency Neurological Life Support: Status Epilepticus.
Article in Neurocritical care, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating Treatment Dynamics in Refractory Status Epilepticus: A Retrospective Observational Cohort Study.The Neurohospitalist · 2026Article
- New-onset refractory status epilepticus after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a review of literature.Croatian medical journal · 2024Review
- Neuron Specific Enolase, S100-beta protein and progranulin as diagnostic biomarkers of status epilepticus.Journal of neurology · 2022Article
- Targeting prostaglandin receptor EP2 for adjunctive treatment of status epilepticus.Pharmacology & therapeutics · 2020Review
- A drone delivery network for antiepileptic drugs: a framework and modelling case study in a low-income country.Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2020Article
- Neuroemergencies in South America: How to Fill in the Gaps?Neurocritical care · 2019Article
- Association of antiepileptic drugs with resolution of epileptiform activity after cardiac arrest.Resuscitation · 2019Observational
- Preliminary experience with point-of-care EEG in post-cardiac arrest patients.Resuscitation · 2019Article
- Updates in Refractory Status Epilepticus.Critical care research and practice · 2018Review
- Phenytoin versus other antiepileptic drugs as treatments for status epilepticus in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Acute medicine & surgeryReview
- Comparison of diazepam and lorazepam for the emergency treatment of adult status epilepticus: a systemic review and meta-analysis.Acute medicine & surgeryReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Patients with prolonged or rapidly recurring convulsions lasting more than 5 min should be considered to be in status epilepticus (SE) and receive immediate resuscitation. Although there are few randomized clinical trials, available evidence and experience suggest that early and aggressive treatment of SE improves patient outcomes, for which reason this was chosen as an Emergency Neurological Life Support protocol. The current approach to the emergency treatment of SE emphasizes rapid initiation of adequate doses of first line therapy, as well as accelerated second line anticonvulsant drugs and induced coma when these fail, coupled with admission to a unit capable of neurological critical care and electroencephalography monitoring. This protocol will focus on the initial treatment of SE but also review subsequent steps in the protocol once the patient is hospitalized.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.