Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913591›Full record

ArticleTropical animal health and production2018

Knowledge, attitudes and practices towards cystic echinococcosis in livestock among selected pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda.

Leonard Omadang, Martin Chamai, Emmanuel Othieno, Andrew Okwi, Francis Olaki Inangolet, Francis Ejobi, Peter Oba, Michael Ocaido

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical animal health and production, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Leonard OmadangCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda. omadangleonard@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5745-7667
Martin ChamaiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Emmanuel OthienoCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Andrew OkwiCollege of Health Sciences, Makerere University, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda.
Francis Olaki InangoletCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Francis EjobiCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Peter ObaNational Agricultural Research Organization, Abi ZARDI, P. O. Box 219, Arua, Uganda.
Michael OcaidoCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda.
Makerere University · UGBusitema University · UGNational Agricultural Research Organisation · UG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was done from March 2013 to May 2014 to assess knowledge, attitudes, and practices towards cystic echinococcosis (CE) or hydatidosis among selected pastoral and agro-pastoral communities in Uganda. A structured questionnaire was administered to 381 respondents. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was done to find the relationship between knowledge about CE and factors such as age, sex, and level of education across all regions. The odds ratio and confidence interval were used to determine the difference in responses across regions. It was shown that age above 36 years was significantly (p < 0.001) associated with awareness about CE in livestock. Likewise, uneducated (p < 0.0001) and agro-pastoralists (p = 0.01) were significantly less knowledgeable than the educated and pastoralists across all regions. The overall knowledge towards CE in livestock was low 17.8% (95% CI = 14.0-21.6). Dog ownership was high and they never dewormed their freely roaming dogs. Dogs shared water with livestock. In conclusion, knowledge about CE in livestock was low across all regions. Therefore, public health education and formulation of policies towards its control by the relevant stakeholders should be done. Also, the true prevalence of CE in livestock needs to be done so that the magnitude and its public health significance are elucidated.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultAnimal HusbandryAnimalsCattleCattle DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDog DiseasesDogsEchinococcosisFarmersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUgandaEchinococcus granulosusKnowledgeLivestockPastoralistsUganda

Identifiers

PMID28913591
OpenAlexW2755723515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.