ReviewCurrent treatment options in cardiovascular medicine2017
Challenges of Anticoagulation Therapy in Pregnancy.
Review in Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2025Guideline
- Clinical challenges of glioma and pregnancy: a systematic review.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2018Pooled it
- Ross Procedure Renaissance: A Contemporary Review of Patient Selection, Technique, and Long-Term Outcomes in Adults.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Review
- Therapeutic role of low molecular weight heparin and fat-soluble vitamins in pregnancy-associated prethrombotic conditions.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- SCAI/EAPCI/ACVC Expert Consensus Statement on Cardiogenic Shock in Women: This statement was endorsed by the Heart Failure Society of America (HFSA).Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2025Article
- Contemporary Management of Cardiomyopathy and Heart Failure in Pregnancy.Cardiology and therapy · 2024Review
- Comparison of minimal versus zero-fluoroscopic catheter ablation in gestational supraventricular arrhythmias.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2023Review
- Lessons from timing of ablation therapy for multi-drug refractory gestational atrial tachycardia with abruptio placentae: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2023Article
- Cardiovascular diseases in Africa in the twenty-first century: Gaps and priorities going forward.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Review
- Article
- Management of Heart Failure and Cardiogenic Shock in Pregnancy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2019Review
- Management of Venous Thromboembolism in Pregnancy.Current treatment options in cardiovascular medicine · 2018Review
- How can Secondary Thromboprophylaxis in High-Risk Pregnant Patients be Improved?Clinical and applied thrombosis/hemostasis : official journal of the International Academy of Clinical and Applied Thrombosis/HemostasisArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementThrombotic complications in pregnancy represent a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Pregnancy is a primary hypercoagulable state due to enhanced production of clotting factors, a decrease in protein S activity, and inhibition of fibrinolysis. These physiologic changes will yield a collective rate of venous thromboembolism (VTE) of about 1-2 in 1000 pregnancies for the general obstetric population, which represents a five- to tenfold increased risk in pregnancy compared to age-matched non-pregnant peers. A select group of women, however, will carry a significantly higher rate of thrombosis due to primary thrombophilia, either inherited or acquired. This introduces a population of women who may benefit from prophylactic anticoagulation, either antepartum or postpartum. The coagulation changes that occur in preparation for the hemostatic challenges of delivery endure for several weeks postpartum. In fact, daily risk for pulmonary embolism (PE) is the highest postpartum. Use of anticoagulation in pregnancy introduces particular risk at the time of delivery, where bleeding and clotting risk collide. Altered metabolism rates of anticoagulants in pregnant women often necessitate closer monitoring than is required outside of pregnancy in order to ensure efficacy and safety. Heparin products are the mainstay of treating VTE in pregnancy, chiefly because they do not cross the placenta. In women with mechanical heart valves, the ideal anticoagulation regimen remains controversial as heparin use has shown inferior outcomes for preventing thromboembolic complications compared to warfarin, but warfarin carries risk for fetal embryopathy. Other populations where a heparin alternative is necessary include women with a history of heparin-associated thrombocytopenia (HIT) or other heparin intolerance. Further challenging the management of anticoagulation in pregnancy is the dearth of randomized clinical trials. The evidence governing treatment recommendations is largely based on expert guidelines, observational studies, or extrapolation from non-pregnant cohorts. A careful critique of a woman's history, as well as the available data, is essential for optimal management of anticoagulation in pregnancy. Such decisions should involve a multidisciplinary team involving obstetrics, hematology, cardiology, and anesthesia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.