ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2017
Only SETBP1 hotspot mutations are associated with refractory disease in myeloid malignancies.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Acute Mast Cell Leukemia Preceded by Malignant Mediastinal Germ Cell Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review.Cancer management and research · 2022Article
- The Role of SETBP1 in Gastric Cancer: Friend or Foe.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionSETBP1 mutations have been established as a diagnostic marker in myeloid malignancies and are associated with inferior survival. Since there is limited data on their clinical impact and stability during disease progression, we sought to investigate the relationship between SETBP1 mutations and disease evolution.
methodsBidirectional Sanger sequencing of the SETBP1 gene was performed for 442 unselected patients with World Health Organization (WHO) defined myeloid disorders. Follow-up analysis was performed on samples from 123/442 patients to investigate SETBP1 mutation dynamics. Targeted deep next-generation sequencing for a panel of 30 leukemia-associated genes was established to study SETBP1 cooperating mutations.
results10/442 patients (2.3%) had SETBP1 hotspot mutations (MDS/MPN, n = 7, sAML, n = 3), whereas four patients (1%) had SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations (MPN, n = 1; MDS, n = 2; sAML, n = 1). The median overall survival for patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations, SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations, and SETBP1 wild type was 14 (range 0-31), 50 (range 0-71), and 47 months (range 0-402), respectively. In Kaplan-Meier analysis, SETBP1 hotspot mutations were significantly associated with reduced overall survival compared to SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations and the SETBP1 wild type (p < 0.001). All 10 patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations died from relapse or disease progression. Three of four patients with SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations are alive with stable disease. Cooperating CSF3R and TET2 mutations were most frequently observed in patients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations.
conclusionsPatients with SETBP1 hotspot mutations suffered from aggressive disease with rapid evolution and inferior overall survival. Patients with SETBP1 non-hotspot mutations had less aggressive disease and a more favorable prognosis. Diagnostic screens for SETBP1 hotspot mutations may help identifying this dismal patient group and treat them in multicenter clinical studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.