Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28913331›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in public health2017

Health Effects and Public Health Concerns of Energy Drink Consumption in the United States: A Mini-Review.

Laila Al-Shaar, Kelsey Vercammen, Chang Lu, Scott Richardson, Martha Tamez, Josiemer Mattei

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in public health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05559372 (Effects of Energy Drink Consumption on Physiological Performance, Mood, and Cardiovascular Outcomes), which is not on this map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
7.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05559372 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Effects of Energy Drink Consumption on Physiological Performance, Mood, and Cardiovascular Outcomes

TypeinterventionalSponsorNathaniel JenkinsRan2021 to 2022Enrolled109ConditionsCaffeine, Exercise Performance, Energy Drink, Cardiovascular SafetyArmsAcute energy drink or placebo consumption
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed, 130 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A randomised experimental study comparing perceptions of two energy drink health warning labels.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2023
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Laila Al-ShaarDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Kelsey VercammenDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Chang LuDepartment of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Scott RichardsonDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Martha TamezDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Josiemer MatteiDepartment of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Harvard University · US

Funding

CVD Epidemiology Training Program in Behavior, the Environment and Global HealthT32HL098048 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI Goodarz Danaei, ERIC B RIMM · 2009 to 2026
$6.9M
Diet quality and cardiometabolic disparities among Latino ethnic subgroupsK01HL120951 · NHLBI · HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI MATTEI, JOSIEMER · 2014 to 2018
$689k
NHLBI NIH HHS K01 HL120951NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL098048
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As energy drink consumption continues to grow worldwide and within the United States, it is important to critically examine the nutritional content and effects on population health of these beverages. This mini-review summarizes the current scientific evidence on health consequences from energy drink consumption, presents relevant public health challenges, and proposes recommendations to mitigate these issues. Emerging evidence has linked energy drink consumption with a number of negative health consequences such as risk-seeking behaviors, poor mental health, adverse cardiovascular effects, and metabolic, renal, or dental conditions. Despite the consistency in evidence, most studies are of cross-sectional design or focus almost exclusively on the effect of caffeine and sugar, failing to address potentially harmful effects of other ingredients. The negative health effects associated with energy drinks (ED) are compounded by a lack of regulatory oversight and aggressive marketing by the industry toward adolescents. Moreover, the rising trend of mixing ED with alcohol presents a new challenge that researchers and public health practitioners must address further. To curb this growing public health issue, policy makers should consider creating a separate regulatory category for ED, setting an evidence-based upper limit on caffeine, restricting sales of ED, and regulating existing ED marketing strategies, especially among children and adolescents.

Indexed as

beveragesenergy drinksfood policyhealth effectsregulationreview

Identifiers

PMID28913331
PMCPMC5583516
OpenAlexW2752436284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.