ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2017
Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical characteristics of angioid streaks in Japanese patients.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- ABCC6 pathogenic variants are associated with hemorrhagic phenotypes in Japanese patients with severe cerebral small vessel disease.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Angioid Streaks Remain a Challenge in Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment.Vision (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Angioid Streaks in Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum.Cureus · 2021Article
- Non-exudative macular neovascularization in pseudoxanthoma elasticum.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2021Article
- Ocular Manifestations Leading to the Diagnosis of Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum with a Novel Heterozygous ABCC6 Mutation: A Case Report.Case reports in dermatologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo report the spectrum of PATIENTS AND
methodsThis was a single-center cohort study. The medical records of 20 patients with AS from 18 unrelated Japanese families were retrospectively reviewed. Screening of the
resultsEight
conclusionsWe identified disease-causing
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.