Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912576›Full record

ArticleNature reviews. Cancer2017

Interrogating open issues in cancer medicine with patient-derived xenografts.

Annette T Byrne, Denis G Alférez, Frédéric Amant, Daniela Annibali, Joaquín Arribas, Andrew V Biankin, Alejandra Bruna, Eva Budinská, Carlos Caldas, David K Chang and 32 more

Abstract readPublished Erratum
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The ongoing trends of patient-derived xenograft models in oncology.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2020
    Article
  19. Progress in the application of organoids to breast cancer research.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2020
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

42 authors.

Annette T Byrne
Denis G Alférez
Frédéric Amant
Daniela Annibali
Joaquín Arribas
Andrew V Biankin
Alejandra Bruna
Eva Budinská
Carlos Caldas
David K Chang
Robert B Clarke
Hans Clevers
George Coukos
Virginie Dangles-Marie
S Gail Eckhardt
Eva Gonzalez-Suarez
Els Hermans
Manuel Hidalgo
Monika A Jarzabek
Steven de Jong
Jos Jonkers
Kristel Kemper
Luisa Lanfrancone
Gunhild Mari Mælandsmo
Elisabetta Marangoni
Jean-Christophe Marine
Enzo Medico
Jens Henrik Norum
Héctor G Palmer
Daniel S Peeper
Pier Giuseppe Pelicci
Alejandro Piris-Gimenez
Sergio Roman-Roman
Oscar M Rueda
Joan Seoane
Violeta Serra
Laura Soucek
Dominique Vanhecke
Alberto Villanueva
Emilie Vinolo
Andrea Bertotti
Livio Trusolino

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16465Cancer Research UK 16942Medical Research Council MR/M008975/1Medical Research Council MR/N005813/1Medical Research Council MR/P012442/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This corrects the article DOI: 10.1038/nrc.2016.140.

Identifiers

PMID28912576

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.