Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912490›Full record

ArticleNature communications2017

The interdependent network of gene regulation and metabolism is robust where it needs to be.

David F Klosik, Anne Grimbs, Stefan Bornholdt, Marc-Thorsten Hütt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Modeling the Th17 and Tregs Paradigm: Implications for Cancer Immunotherapy.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Universal behavior of cascading failures in interdependent networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

David F KlosikInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, 28359, Bremen, Germany.
Anne GrimbsDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, Campus Ring 1, 28759, Bremen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7836-7572
Stefan BornholdtInstitute for Theoretical Physics, University of Bremen, Hochschulring 18, 28359, Bremen, Germany. bornholdt@itp.uni-bremen.de.
Marc-Thorsten HüttDepartment of Life Sciences and Chemistry, Jacobs University, Campus Ring 1, 28759, Bremen, Germany. m.huett@jacobs-university.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite being highly interdependent, the major biochemical networks of the living cell-the networks of interacting genes and of metabolic reactions, respectively-have been approached mostly as separate systems so far. Recently, a framework for interdependent networks has emerged in the context of statistical physics. In a first quantitative application of this framework to systems biology, here we study the interdependent network of gene regulation and metabolism for the model organism Escherichia coli in terms of a biologically motivated percolation model. Particularly, we approach the system's conflicting tasks of reacting rapidly to (internal and external) perturbations, while being robust to minor environmental fluctuations. Considering its response to perturbations that are localized with respect to functional criteria, we find the interdependent system to be sensitive to gene regulatory and protein-level perturbations, yet robust against metabolic changes. We expect this approach to be applicable to a range of other interdependent networks.Although networks of interacting genes and metabolic reactions are interdependent, they have largely been treated as separate systems. Here the authors apply a statistical framework for interdependent networks to E. coli, and show that it is sensitive to gene and protein perturbations but robust against metabolic changes.

Indexed as

Gene Regulatory NetworksModels, BiologicalEscherichia coliGene Expression Regulation, BacterialRandom Allocation

Identifiers

PMID28912490
PMCPMC5599549

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.