Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28912341›Full record

ArticleGenetics2017

The Role of Blm Helicase in Homologous Recombination, Gene Conversion Tract Length, and Recombination Between Diverged Sequences in

Henry A Ertl, Daniel P Russo, Noori Srivastava, Joseph T Brooks, Thu N Dao, Jeannine R LaRocque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Efficient gene editing through an intronic selection marker in cells.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2022
    Article
  8. The Role ofGenes · 2021
    Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Henry A ErtlDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.
Daniel P RussoDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.
Noori SrivastavaDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.
Joseph T BrooksDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.
Thu N DaoDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057.
Jeannine R LaRocqueDepartment of Human Science, Georgetown University Medical Center, Washington, DC 20057 Jan.LaRocque@georgetown.edu.

Funding

Double-strand break repair and suppression of recombination in D. melanogasterR15GM110454 · NIGMS · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI LAROCQUE KAPPAS, JEANNINE · 2014 to 2014
$354k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM110454
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are a particularly deleterious class of DNA damage that threatens genome integrity. DSBs are repaired by three pathways: nonhomologous-end joining (NHEJ), homologous recombination (HR), and single-strand annealing (SSA).

Indexed as

DNA End-Joining RepairGene ConversionRecombinational DNA RepairAnimalsATP-Binding Cassette TransportersDNA HelicasesDrosophila melanogasterDrosophila ProteinsEye ProteinsLoss of Function MutationATP-Binding Cassette Transportersblm protein, DrosophilaDNA HelicasesDrosophila ProteinsEye Proteinsw protein, DrosophilaDrosophilagene conversion tractshomeologous recombinationhomologous recombinationsuppression of recombination between diverged sequences

Identifiers

PMID28912341
PMCPMC5676224

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.